Cited by 810Neural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain functionMachine Learning and ELM

Neural Networks

Rojas, Raúl·1996·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-61068-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optical implementations have been viewed as optimal for neural networks, in the classical case, due to the low design cost of adding multiple connections (as light passes through light without interacting).

    “Moreover optical implementations have been viewed as optimal for neural networks, in the classical case, due to the low design cost of adding multiple connections (as light passes through light without interacting).39”

    From Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as [39]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rojas, R.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Rojas, Raúl
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
1996
OpenAlex
W4241395986
Cited by
810
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 35
FWCI
1.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
Keywords
artificial neural networks, neural network theory, computational model, computing paradigms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review