The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies
Abstract
We explore the relationship between column aerosol optical thickness (AOT) derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MODIS) on the Terra/Aqua satellites and hourly fine particulate mass (PM 2.5) measured at the surface at seven locations in Jefferson county, Alabama for 2002. Results indicate that there is a good correlation between the satellite‐derived AOT and PM 2.5 (linear correlation coefficient, R = 0.7) indicating that most of the aerosols are in the well‐mixed lower boundary layer during the satellite overpass times. There is excellent agreement between the monthly mean PM 2.5 and MODIS AOT (R > 0.9), with maximum values during the summer months due to enhanced photolysis. The PM 2.5 has a distinct diurnal signature with maxima in the early morning (6:00 ∼ 8:00AM) due to increased traffic flow and restricted mixing depths during these hours. Using simple empirical linear relationships derived between the MODIS AOT and 24hr mean PM 2.5 we show that the MODIS AOT can be used quantitatively to estimate air quality categories as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with an accuracy of more than 90% in cloud‐free conditions. We discuss the factors that affect the correlation between satellite‐derived AOT and PM 2.5 mass, and emphasize that more research is needed before applying these methods and results over other areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing PM 2.5 Exposures with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Continental United States
Di, Q., Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., & Schwartz, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06121 · Cited by 510
Quantifying wildfires exposure for investigating health-related effects
Youssouf, H., Liousse, C., Roblou, L., Assamoi, E. M., Salonen, R. O., Maesano, C., Banerjee, S., & Annesi-Maesano, I. (2014) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.041 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., & Christopher, S. A.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 21
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2108162680
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003gl018174
- The paper
- Wang, J., & Christopher, S. A. (2003). Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.