Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long‐range transport of Saharan dust to northern Europe: The 11–16 October 2001 outbreak observed with EARLINET

Open access
Ansmann, Albert, Bösenberg, Jens, Chaikovsky, Anatoli, Comerón, Adolfo, Eckhardt, Sabine, Eixmann, Ronald, Freudenthaler, Volker, Ginoux, Paul, Komguem, Leonce, Linné, Holger, Márquez, Miguel Ángel López, Matthias, Volker, Mattis, Ina, Mitev, Valentin, Müller, Detlef, Music, Svetlana, Nickovic, Slobodan, Pelon, Jacques, Sauvage, Laurent, Sobolewsky, Piotr, Srivastava, Manoj K., Stohl, Andreas, Torres, Omar, Vaughan, Geraint, Wandinger, Ulla, Wiegner, Matthias·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The spread of mineral particles over southwestern, western, and central Europe resulting from a strong Saharan dust outbreak in October 2001 was observed at 10 stations of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). For the first time, an optically dense desert dust plume over Europe was characterized coherently with high vertical resolution on a continental scale. The main layer was located above the boundary layer (above 1‐km height above sea level (asl)) up to 3–5‐km height, and traces of dust particles reached heights of 7–8 km. The particle optical depth typically ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 above 1‐km height asl at the wavelength of 532 nm, and maximum values close to 0.8 were found over northern Germany. The lidar observations are in qualitative agreement with values of optical depth derived from Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data. Ten‐day backward trajectories clearly indicated the Sahara as the source region of the particles and revealed that the dust layer observed, e.g., over Belsk, Poland, crossed the EARLINET site Aberystwyth, UK, and southern Scandinavia 24–48 hours before. Lidar‐derived particle depolarization ratios, backscatter‐ and extinction‐related Ångström exponents, and extinction‐to‐backscatter ratios mainly ranged from 15 to 25%, −0.5 to 0.5, and 40–80 sr, respectively, within the lofted dust plumes. A few atmospheric model calculations are presented showing the dust concentration over Europe. The simulations were found to be consistent with the network observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2003jd003757

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Ansmann, A., Bösenberg, J., Chaikovsky, A., Comerón, A., Eckhardt, S., Eixmann, R., Freudenthaler, V., Ginoux, P., Komguem, L., Linné, H., Márquez, M. Á. L., Matthias, V., Mattis, I., Mitev, V., Müller, D., Music, S., Nickovic, S., Pelon, J., Sauvage, L., Sobolewsky, P., Srivastava, M. K., Stohl, A., Torres, O., Vaughan, G., Wandinger, U., & Wiegner, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2003-12-24
Volume
108
Issue
D24
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1897274086
Cited by
487
References
0
FWCI
14.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐range transport of Saharan dust to northern Europe: The 11–16 October 2001 outbreak observed with EARLINET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd003757
The paper
Ansmann, A., Bösenberg, J., Chaikovsky, A., Comerón, A., Eckhardt, S., Eixmann, R., Freudenthaler, V., Ginoux, P., Komguem, L., Linné, H., Márquez, M. Á. L., Matthias, V., Mattis, I., Mitev, V., Müller, D., Music, S., Nickovic, S., Pelon, J., Sauvage, L., . . . Wiegner, M. (2003). Long‐range transport of Saharan dust to northern Europe: The 11–16 October 2001 outbreak observed with EARLINET. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003757

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.