The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames
Open accessAbstract
It is widely accepted that substantial relative motion has occurred between the Indo‐Atlantic and Pacific hot spots since the Late Cretaceous. At the same time, a fixed Indo‐Atlantic hot spot reference frame has been argued for and used since the advent of plate tectonics, implying relatively little motion between the hot spots in this domain since about 130 Ma. Most plumes purported to have caused these hot spots, while being advected in the global‐scale mantle flow field, are assumed to move an order of magnitude more slowly than plates. However, the lifetime of a plume may be over ∼100 Myr, and the integrated motion of a plume is expected to be significant over these times. The uncertainties inherent in hot spot reconstructions are of a magnitude similar to the expected plume motion, and so any differences between a fixed and moving frame of reference must be discernible beyond the level of these uncertainties. We present a method for constraining hot spot reconstruction uncertainties, similar to that in use for relative plate motion. We use a modified Hellinger criterion of fit for the hot spot problem, using track geometries and radiometric dating, and derive covariance matrices for our Indo‐Atlantic rotations for the last 120 Myr. However, any given mantle convection model introduces additional uncertainties into such models, based on its model parameters and starting conditions (e.g., choice of global tomography model, viscosity profile, nature of mantle phase transitions). We use an interactive evolutionary approach, where we constrain the hot spot motion resulting from convection models to fit paleomagnetic constraints, and converge on an acceptable motion solution by varying unknowns over several generations of simulations. Our hot spot motion model shows large motion (5–10°) of the Indo‐Atlantic hot spots for times >80 Ma, consistent with available paleomagnetic constraints. The differences between the fixed and moving hot spot reference frames are not discernible over the level of uncertainty in such rotations for times <80 Ma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Sea Floor Topography from Satellite Altimetry and Ship Depth Soundings
Smith, W. H. F., & Sandwell, D. T. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5334.1956 · Cited by 4,709
Convection plumes in the lower mantle
MORGAN, W. J. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/230042a0 · Cited by 2,565
Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry
Sandwell, D. T., & Smith, W. H. F. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/96jb03223 · Cited by 1,825
Hotspots and mantle plumes: Some phenomenology
Sleep, N. H. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb095ib05p06715 · Cited by 1,119
Finite-Frequency Tomography Reveals a Variety of Plumes in the Mantle
Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F. A., Masters, G., Engdahl, E. R., & Hung, S.-H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092485 · Cited by 1,033
Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr
Besse, J., & Courtillot, V. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2000jb000050 · Cited by 993
Deep Mantle Convection Plumes and Plate Motions
(2), W. J. M. (1972) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/819a3e50-16c5-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 940
Cenozoic magmatism throughout east Africa resulting from impact of a single plume
Ebinger, C. J., & Sleep, N. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27417 · Cited by 841
Layered convection induced by phase transitions
Christensen, U. R., & Yuen, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb090ib12p10291 · Cited by 692
Degree 12 model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle
Su, W., Woodward, R. L., & Dziewonski, A. M. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/93jb03408 · Cited by 672
Cited by
A Review of the Role of Subduction Dynamics for Regional and Global Plate Motions
Becker, T. W., & Faccenna, C. (2009) · Frontiers in Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_1 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, C., Müller, D., & Steinberger, B.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1492331027
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 27.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004gc000784
- The paper
- O'Neill, C., Müller, D., & Steinberger, B. (2005). On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gc000784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.