Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GPS crustal strain, postglacial rebound, and seismic hazard in eastern North America: The Saint Lawrence valley example

Mazzotti, Stéphane, James, Thomas S., Henton, Joe, Adams, John·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

We present Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements that constrain the amplitude, pattern, and origin of crustal deformation in the Saint Lawrence valley, Québec, one of the most seismically active regions of eastern North America. The GPS network shows coherent southeastward motion of 0.6 ± 0.2 mm yr−1, relative to North America, and uplift of 2.6 ± 0.4 mm yr−1. Network average horizontal strain rates are mostly ESE‐WNW shortening at (1.7 ± 1.0) × 10−9 yr−1. The shortening rate across the Charlevoix seismic zone is about twice as big as the regional average. These measurements are consistent with both postglacial rebound (PGR) models and the deformation style indicated by earthquake focal mechanisms. Although the GPS data do not discriminate between various models of crustal deformation, they provide important constraints on large earthquake recurrence. Assuming that the GPS strain estimates are representative of seismic moment release, they constrain the maximum magnitude of truncated Gutenberg‐Richter recurrence statistics in the Charlevoix seismic zone to MX= 7.8 ± 0.6 (one M≥ 7 earthquake per 400–1300 years). The remarkable agreement between the GPS strain rates, seismic catalogue statistics, and PGR predictions suggests that in Charlevoix, most of the PGR‐driven crustal strain may be released by large (M≥ 7) earthquakes. In the rest of the Saint Lawrence valley, PGR strain rates are significantly larger than seismic strain rates, suggesting either that PGR deformation remains mostly elastic or that large events are more frequent than indicated by small earthquake statistics (i.e., characteristic earthquakes).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004jb003590

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Adams J., 1995, The Canadian crustal stress database: A compilation to 1994, Geol. Surv. Can. Open File, 3122
  2. Adams J., 1991, Neotectonics of North America, Decade Map, 261
  3. Adams J., 2003, Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 Building Code of Canada, Geol. Surv. Can. Open File, 4459
  4. Adams J., 1995, Northeastern North America earthquake potential—New challenges for seismic hazard mapping, Geol. Surv. Can. Current Res., 1995, 91
  5. 10.1029/2001JB000561 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2003.12.003 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1060152 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80209-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1785/gssrl.71.2.283 · DOI
  10. 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1467:APRITN>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  11. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0175:DDTISI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1785/gssrl.73.5.762 · DOI
  13. Hugentobler U. S.Schaer andP.Fridez(Eds.) (2001) Documentation of the Bernese GPS software version 4. 2 511 pp. Astron. Inst. Univ. of Bern Bern.
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb02804.x · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2001JB001710 · DOI
  16. 10.1029/94GL01854 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/97JB03539 · DOI
  18. 10.1029/93GL00865 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-94-009-2311-9_18 · DOI
  20. 10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.339 · DOI
  21. Joshi A., 2004, Localized weak zones and their role in generation of intraplate seismicity: Effects of weak zone geometry and rheology, Eos Trans. AGU, 85
  22. 10.1007/s000240050277 · DOI
  23. Kanamori H., 1975, Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65, 1073
  24. 10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00154-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.289.5488.2329 · DOI
  26. Kumarapeli P. S., 1985, Vestiges of Iapetan rifting in the craton west of the northern Appalachians, Geosci. Can., 12, 54
  27. 10.1029/2000GL012611 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00120-4 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1139/e02-104 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1139/e02-046 · DOI
  31. Malvern L. E., 1969, Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Media
  32. 10.1029/1998JB900033 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2004JB003510 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00520-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1029/2003JB002653 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.1057022 · DOI
  37. 10.1029/2000JB900312 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.284.5414.619 · DOI
  39. 10.1029/2001GL013782 · DOI
  40. 10.1029/98RG02638 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jqs.713 · DOI
  42. 10.1029/2003JB002944 · DOI
  43. 10.1139/e68-128 · DOI
  44. Sella G. F., 2004, Direct constraints on GIA motion in North America using GPS, Eos Trans. AGU, 85
  45. 10.1785/gssrl.72.6.745 · DOI
  46. 10.1029/97JB02716 · DOI
  47. Tremblay A., 2001, Supracrustal faults of the St Lawrence Rift system, Quebec: Kinematics and geometry as revealed by field mapping and marine seismic reflection data, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 33, A‐210
  48. 10.1029/90JB01583 · DOI
  49. Wells D. L., 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 974, 10.1785/BSSA0840040974 · DOI
  50. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0105:EATCLO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1139/e79-070 · DOI
  52. 10.1029/2003JB002741 · DOI
  53. 10.1029/JB085iB11p06113 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mazzotti, S., James, T. S., Henton, J., & Adams, J.
Affiliations
  • Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre Sidney, British Columbia Canada
  • Natural Resources Canada Geodetic Survey Division Ottawa, Ontairo Canada
  • Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2005-11
Volume
110
Issue
B11
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
81
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review