The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data?
Open accessAbstract
Several global quantities are computed from the ERA40 reanalysis for the period 1958–2001 and explored for trends. These are discussed in the context of changes to the global observing system. Temperature, integrated water vapor (IWV), and kinetic energy are considered. The ERA40 global mean temperature in the lower troposphere has a trend of +0.11 K per decade over the period of 1979–2001, which is slightly higher than the MSU measurements, but within the estimated error limit. For the period 1958–2001 the warming trend is 0.14 K per decade but this is likely to be an artifact of changes in the observing system. When this is corrected for, the warming trend is reduced to 0.10 K per decade. The global trend in IWV for the period 1979–2001 is +0.36 mm per decade. This is about twice as high as the trend determined from the Clausius‐Clapeyron relation assuming conservation of relative humidity. It is also larger than results from free climate model integrations driven by the same observed sea surface temperature as used in ERA40. It is suggested that the large trend in IWV does not represent a genuine climate trend but an artifact caused by changes in the global observing system such as the use of SSM/I and more satellite soundings in later years. Recent results are in good agreement with GPS measurements. The IWV trend for the period 1958–2001 is still higher but reduced to +0.16 mm per decade when corrected for changes in the observing systems. Total kinetic energy shows an increasing global trend. Results from data assimilation experiments strongly suggest that this trend is also incorrect and mainly caused by the huge changes in the global observing system in 1979. When this is corrected for, no significant change in global kinetic energy from 1958 onward can be found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Changing Character of Precipitation
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., & Parsons, D. B. (2003) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-84-9-1205 · Cited by 3,196
Cited by
The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J., Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.776 · Cited by 3,518
A 50‐year high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system
Vidal, J., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., & Soubeyroux, J. (2010) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.2003 · Cited by 788
Quasiresonant amplification of planetary waves and recent Northern Hemisphere weather extremes
Petoukhov, V., Rahmstorf, S., Petri, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222000110 · Cited by 464
Lorenz, C., & Kunstmann, H. (2012) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-11-088.1 · Cited by 349
Climate data uncertainty for agricultural impact assessments in West Africa
Romanovska, P., Gleixner, S., & Gornott, C. (2023) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-023-04430-3 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bengtsson, L., Hagemann, S., & Hodges, K. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-06-09
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D11
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051693931
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd004536
- The paper
- Bengtsson, L., Hagemann, S., & Hodges, K. I. (2004). Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.