The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 50‐year high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system
Open accessAbstract
The assessment of regional climate change requires the development of reference long‐term retrospective meteorological datasets. This article presents an 8‐km‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France performed with the the Safran‐gauge‐based analysis system for the period 1958–2008. Climatological features of the Safran 50‐year analysis—long‐term mean values, inter‐annual and seasonal variability—are first presented for all computed variables: rainfall, snowfall, mean air temperature, specific humidity, wind speed and solar and infrared radiation. The spatial patterns of precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature are compared with another spatialization method, and the temporal consistency of the reanalysis is assessed through various validation experiments with both dependent and independent data. These experiments demonstrate the overall robustness of the Safran reanalysis and the improvement of its quality with time, in connection with the sharp increase in the observation network density that occurred in the 1990s. They also show the differentiated sensitivity of variables to the number of available ground observations, with precipitation and air temperature being the more robust ones. The comparison of trends from the reanalysis with those from homogenized series finally shows that if spatial patterns are globally consistent with both approaches, care must be taken when using literal values from the reanalysis and corresponding statistical significance in climate change detection studies. The Safran 50‐year atmospheric reanalysis constitutes a long‐term forcing datasets for land surface schemes and thus enables the simulation of the past 50 years of water resources over France. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., et al. (1996) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:tnyrp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 28,360
Nonparametric Tests Against Trend
Mann, H. B. (1945) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907187 · Cited by 17,144
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
Taylor, K. E. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900719 · Cited by 8,477
Uppala, S. M., KÅllberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V. D. C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., et al. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.04.176 · Cited by 6,804
NCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2)
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., & Potter, G. L. (2002) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-83-11-1631 · Cited by 5,771
A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5)
Grell, G., Dudhia, J., & Stauffer, D. (1994) · doi:10.5065/d60z716b · Cited by 3,822
North American Regional Reanalysis
Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jović, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-87-3-343 · Cited by 3,378
Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones, P. D., & New, M. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd010201 · Cited by 2,437
A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas
New, M., Lister, D., Hulme, M., & Makin, I. (2002) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr021001 · Cited by 2,246
Sheffield, J., Goteti, G., & Wood, E. F. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3790.1 · Cited by 1,942
Cited by
Multi-source global wetland maps combining surface water imagery and groundwater constraints
Tootchi, A., Jost, A., & Ducharne, A. (2019) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-11-189-2019 · Cited by 165
Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the KGE criterion
Santos, L., Thirel, G., & Perrin, C. (2018) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-22-4583-2018 · Cited by 148
Huynh, N. N. T., Garambois, P.-A., Renard, B., Colleoni, F., Monnier, J., & Roux, H. (2025) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-29-3589-2025 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Vidal, J., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., & Soubeyroux, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1627-1644
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W1979110338
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 50‐year high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.2003
- The paper
- Vidal, J., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., & Soubeyroux, J. (2010). A 50‐year high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.