The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping annual mean ground‐level PM2.5 concentrations using Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous United States
Open accessAbstract
We present a simple approach to estimating ground‐level fine particulate matter (PM 2.5, particles smaller than 2.5 μm in diameter) concentrations by applying local scaling factors from a global atmospheric chemistry model (GEOS‐CHEM with GOCART dust and sea salt data) to aerosol optical thickness (AOT) retrieved by the Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR). The resulting MISR PM 2.5 concentrations are compared with measurements from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PM 2.5 compliance network for the year 2001. Regression analyses show that the annual mean MISR PM 2.5 concentration is strongly correlated with EPA PM 2.5 concentration (correlation coefficient r = 0.81), with an estimated slope of 1.00 and an insignificant intercept, when three potential outliers from Southern California are excluded. The MISR PM 2.5 concentrations have a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.20 μg/m 3, which corresponds to a relative error (RMSE over mean EPA PM 2.5 concentration) of approximately 20%. Using simulated aerosol vertical profiles generated by the global models helps to reduce the uncertainty in estimated PM 2.5 concentrations due to the changing correlation between lower and upper tropospheric aerosols and therefore to improve the capability of MISR AOT in estimating surface‐level PM 2.5 concentrations. The estimated seasonal mean PM 2.5 concentrations exhibited substantial uncertainty, particularly in the west. With improved MISR cloud screening algorithms and the dust simulation of global models, as well as a higher model spatial resolution, we expect that this approach will be able to make reliable estimation of seasonal average surface‐level PM 2.5 concentration at higher temporal and spatial resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., & Boys, B. L. (2015) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1408646 · Cited by 894
Assessing PM 2.5 Exposures with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Continental United States
Di, Q., Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., & Schwartz, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06121 · Cited by 510
A review of advances in the retrieval of aerosol properties by remote sensing multi-angle technology
Si, Y., Lu, Q., Zhang, X., Hu, X., Wang, F., Li, L., & Gu, S. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117928 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q., Kilaru, V., & Sarnat, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-11-24
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D22
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972585310
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping annual mean ground‐level PM2.5 concentrations using Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005025
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q., Kilaru, V., & Sarnat, J. A. (2004). Mapping annual mean ground‐level PM2.5 concentrations using Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.