The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States
Abstract
Droughts have severe economic, environmental and social impacts. Timely determination of the current level of drought may aid the decision making process in reducing the impacts from drought. In this study, high‐resolution, land surface hydrology simulations using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model are used to derive a hydrologically based drought index. Soil moisture data from a retrospective simulation from 1950 to 1999 over the continental United States are used to develop probability distributions of monthly average soil moisture, and the relative position of soil moisture fields within the historic distribution provides a measure of drought in relation to the long‐term behavior. The index is able to identify the major drought events during the latter part of the twentieth century and shows good agreement with the time series of U.S. drought from two Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) data sets. On average, 30% of the United States experienced dry conditions (<10% soil moisture quantile) during 1950–1999, peaking at over 70% coverage at the height of the 1950s drought. Many dry events exhibit long‐term persistence, especially in the West, which is important in terms of the cumulative impacts. The physical basis of the model allows the index to take into account a number of processes, which contribute to the development of drought, such as snow accumulation and melt that other indices ignore or treat unsatisfactorily. Furthermore, the high spatial and temporal resolution of the simulations ensure that the drought index is able to allow for the effects of short‐term changes in meteorology as well as longer‐term climate variations, and resolve the high spatial variability in soil moisture and drought occurrence. The potential for implementing the analysis in an operational mode exists by using data from the near real‐time simulations within the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176
Seasonal Drought Prediction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Prospects
Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., & Xia, Y. (2018) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2016rg000549 · Cited by 607
Climate change and wildfire in California
Westerling, A. L., & Bryant, B. P. (2008) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9363-z · Cited by 432
Increase in severe and extreme soil moisture droughts for Europe under climate change
Grillakis, M. G. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.001 · Cited by 404
Understanding the Role of Climate Characteristics in Drought Propagation
Apurv, T., Sivapalan, M., & Cai, X. (2017) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2017wr021445 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheffield, J., Goteti, G., Wen, F., & Wood, E. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-12-27
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D24
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021184758
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005182
- The paper
- Sheffield, J., Goteti, G., Wen, F., & Wood, E. F. (2004). A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.