The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneous chemistry of individual mineral dust particles with nitric acid: A combined CCSEM/EDX, ESEM, and ICP‐MS study
Open accessAbstract
The heterogeneous chemistry of individual dust particles from four authentic dust samples with gas phase nitric acid was investigated in this combined computer‐controlled scanning electron microscopy with energy‐dispersive X‐ray (CCSEM/EDX) analysis, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS) study. Morphology and compositional changes of individual particles as they react with nitric acid were observed using conventional scanning electron microscopy with energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis and CCSEM/EDX. ESEM was utilized to investigate the hygroscopic behavior of mineral dust particles reacted with nitric acid. Differences in the reactivity of mineral dust particles from these four different dust source regions with nitric acid were observed. Mineral dust from source regions containing high levels of calcium, namely, China loess dust and Saudi coastal dust, were found to react to the greatest extent. In particular, we show that calcium carbonate rich dust aerosols may exhibit continuous, extensive reactivity with nitric acid resulting in formation of highly hygroscopic calcium nitrate particles. Transformation of dry mineral dust into an aqueous liquid aerosol has a tremendous impact on its light scattering properties, ability to modify clouds, heterogeneous chemistry, and gas to particle partitioning in the atmosphere. ICP‐MS was used to estimate maximal extent of possible CaCO 3‐to‐Ca(NO 3)2 conversion in the mineral dust samples. We show that in China loess dust and Saudi coastal dust aerosols, formation of calcium nitrate particles can take place at the total extent as high as ∼20–40 wt %.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., & Curtis, J. H. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000615 · Cited by 459
Hastings, M. G., Sigman, D. M., & Steig, E. J. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2005gb002502 · Cited by 73
Fine Ash-Bearing Particles as a Major Aerosol Component in Biomass Burning Smoke
Adachi, K., Dibb, J. E., Scheuer, E., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., Mediavilla, B., Guo, H., Campuzano‐Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., et al. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035657 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Laskin, A., Wietsma, T. W., Krueger, B. J., & Grassian, V. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-05-26
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- D10
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028959227
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneous chemistry of individual mineral dust particles with nitric acid: A combined CCSEM/EDX, ESEM, and ICP‐MS study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005206
- The paper
- Laskin, A., Wietsma, T. W., Krueger, B. J., & Grassian, V. H. (2005). Heterogeneous chemistry of individual mineral dust particles with nitric acid: A combined CCSEM/EDX, ESEM, and ICP‐MS study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.