Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stratospheric water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air entering the stratosphere in the tropics

Open access
Fueglistaler, S., Bonazzola, M., Haynes, P. H., Peter, T.·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We present results of Lagrangian troposphere‐to‐stratosphere transport (TST) in the tropics based on trajectory calculations for the period 1979–2001. The trajectories and corresponding temperature histories are calculated from wind and temperature fields provided by the reanalysis data ERA‐40 of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The water vapor mixing ratio of air entering the tropical stratosphere is calculated from the minimum saturation mixing ratio over ice encountered by each trajectory. We show that this Lagrangian approach, which considers the global‐scale to synoptic‐scale dynamics of tropical TST but neglects mesoscale dynamics and details of cloud microphysics, substantially improves estimates of stratospheric humidity compared to calculations based on Eulerian mean tropical tropopause temperatures. For the period 1979–2001 we estimate from the Lagrangian calculation that the mean water mixing ratio of air entering the stratosphere is 3.5 ppmv, which is in good agreement with measurements during the same period, ranging from 3.3 ppmv to 4 ppmv, whereas an estimate based on an Eulerian mean calculation is about 6 ppmv. The amplitude of the annual cycle in water vapor mixing ratio at a potential temperature of 400 K in the tropics estimated from the Lagrangian calculation is compared with measurements of water vapor from the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE). For the period 1992–2001, when HALOE measurements and ERA‐40 data overlap, we calculate a peak‐to‐peak amplitude of ∼1.7 ppmv, in good agreement with ∼1.6 ppmv seen in HALOE data. On average, the Lagrangian calculations have a moist bias of ∼0.2 ppmv, equivalent to a warm bias of the Lagrangian cold point of about 0.5 K. We conclude that the Lagrangian calculation based on synoptic‐scale velocity and temperature fields yields estimates for stratospheric water vapor in good agreement with observations and that mesoscale and cloud microphysical processes need not be invoked, at first order, to explain annual mean and seasonal variation of water vapor mixing ratios in the tropical lower stratosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004jd005516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Fueglistaler, S., Bonazzola, M., Haynes, P. H., & Peter, T.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2005-04-21
Volume
110
Issue
D8
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000796183
Cited by
264
References
1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stratospheric water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air entering the stratosphere in the tropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005516
The paper
Fueglistaler, S., Bonazzola, M., Haynes, P. H., & Peter, T. (2005). Stratospheric water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air entering the stratosphere in the tropics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005516

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.