Cited by 272Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

Ceres: Evolution and current state

Open access
McCord, Thomas B., Sotin, Christophe·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

We modeled several thermal evolution scenarios for Ceres to explore the nature of large, wet protoplanets and to predict current‐day evidence that might be found by close inspection, such as by the Dawn mission. The density for Ceres is near 2.1, suggesting a water content between 17% and 27% by mass. Short‐ and long‐lived radioactive nuclide heating is considered. Even if only long‐lived radionuclide heating is assumed, the water ice in Ceres melts quickly and a water mantle forms, but an approximately 10‐km crust does not melt. The circulating warm water would alter the silicates. As heat is lost by conduction through the frozen crust, water begins to freeze out at the base of the crust. Solid‐state convection begins and transports more heat as well as perhaps material dissolved or entrained in the water to or near the surface. Ceres' water layer eventually (but perhaps not entirely) freezes, forming a layered density structure with perhaps some liquid water remaining today. Our differentiated models are in agreement with the recently measured difference between the equatorial and polar radii. We find that Ceres' existence and evolution depend critically on it containing water at formation, and this depends strongly on the combination of when it accreted and the amount of 26 Al present in the pre‐Ceres ∼1‐km‐sized objects; slightly more 26 Al or earlier accretion produces a dry Vesta‐like object. Melting and freezing plus mineralization would lead to several dimensional changes over time, creating topographic features, zones of weakness, and perhaps disruptions in the crust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004je002244

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ceres is likely differentiated into a rocky core and icy shell.

    “It is 25% the size of our Moon and twice the size of Enceladus and likely differentiated into a rocky core and icy shell (McCord and Sotin, 2005; Thomas et al., 2005).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as McCord and Sotin, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCord, T. B., & Sotin, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géosciences (FR)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2005-05
Volume
110
Issue
E5
Pages
CiteID EO5009
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086841799
Cited by
272
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
Ceres, thermal evolution, radiogenic heat production, 26Al, solid-state convection, density structure, Dawn mission, topographic features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review