Cited by 81Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceHistory and Developments in Astronomy

The Faint Young Sun Paradox: an observational test of an alternative solar model

Open access
Gaidos, Eric J., Güdel, Manuel, Blake, Geoffrey A.·2000·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

We report the results of deep observations at radio (3.6 cm) wavelengths of the nearby solar-type star pi 01 Ursa Majoris with the Very Large Array (VLA) intended to test an alternative theory of solar luminosity evolution. The standard model predicts a solar luminosity only 75% of the present value and surface temperatures below freezing on Earth and Mars at 4 Ga, seemingly in conflict with geologic evidence for liquid water on these planets. An alternative model invokes a compensatory mass loss through a declining solar wind that results in a more consistent early luminosity. The free-free emission from an enhanced wind around nearby young Sun-like stars should be detectable at microwave frequencies. Our observations of pi 01 UMa, a 300 million year-old solar-mass star, place an upper limit on the mass loss rate of 4-5 x 10(-11) M(solar) yr-1. Total mass loss from such a star over 4 Gyr would be less than 6%. If this star is indeed an analog of the early Sun, it casts doubt on the alternative model as a solution to the faint young Sun paradox, particularly for Mars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gl010740

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upper limits on mass loss rates of young Sun-like stars from radio observations and rotation-rate considerations rule out the early Sun being more massive and luminous enough to solve the faint young Sun problem.

    “However, upper limits on the mass loss rates of young Sun-like stars from radio observations and considerations of how rapidly the rotation rates of Sun-like stars decrease with age rule out this solution (Gaidos et al. 2000; Johnstone et al. 2015; Fichtinger et al. 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaidos, E. J., Güdel, M., & Blake, G. A.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2000-02-15
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
501-503
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2135171925
Cited by
81
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
faint young Sun paradox, free-free emission, solar-type stars, Mars habitability, liquid water on Mars, stellar mass loss rates
MeSH terms
Astronomy, Extraterrestrial Environment, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Physics, Radio Waves, Solar System, Exobiology, Solar Activity, Physical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review