The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacts of biomass burning emissions and land use change on Amazonian atmospheric phosphorus cycling and deposition
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) availability constrains both carbon uptake and loss in some of the world's most productive ecosystems. In some of these regions, atmospheric aerosols appear to be an important, if not dominant, source of new P inputs. For example, previous work suggests that mineral aerosols from North Africa bring significant amounts of new phosphorus to the P‐impoverished soils of the Amazon Basin. Here we use recent observations and atmospheric transport modeling to show that the Amazon Basin itself appears to be losing atmospheric phosphorus to neighboring regions as a consequence of biomass burning emissions, anthropogenic sources of mineral aerosols and primary biogenic particles. Observations suggest that biomass burning emissions and human disturbance are responsible for ∼23% of the phosphorus flux in the Amazon. Although biomass burning and disturbance may bring new phosphorus into nondisturbed regions, as a whole the Amazon appears to be losing phosphorus through the atmosphere. Phosphorus lost via atmospheric transport from the Amazon is deposited in the adjacent oceans and in other regions downwind. These results suggest that land use change within the Amazon may substantially increase phosphorus availability to the remaining undisturbed forests, and that this fertilization mechanism could potentially contribute to recent changes in carbon uptake measured in undisturbed stands, as well as fertilizing downwind ocean regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Self-citation
Cited by
Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate
Liu, Y., Stanturf, J., & Goodrick, S. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.002 · Cited by 791
Mahowald, N., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., Artaxo, P., Benitez‐Nelson, C. R., Bergametti, G., Bond, T. C., Chen, Y., Cohen, D. D., Herut, B., et al. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2008gb003240 · Cited by 772
Self-citationAerosol Indirect Effect on Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate
Mahowald, N. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207374 · Cited by 481
Self-citationYu, H., Chin, M., Yuan, T., Bian, H., Remer, L. A., Prospero, J. M., Omar, A., Winker, D., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2015gl063040 · Cited by 409
Lawrence, C. R., & Neff, J. C. (2009) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.02.005 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahowald, N. M., Artaxo, P., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Okin, G. S., Randerson, J. T., & Townsend, A. R.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2137071014
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of biomass burning emissions and land use change on Amazonian atmospheric phosphorus cycling and deposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005gb002541
- The paper
- Mahowald, N. M., Artaxo, P., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Okin, G. S., Randerson, J. T., & Townsend, A. R. (2005). Impacts of biomass burning emissions and land use change on Amazonian atmospheric phosphorus cycling and deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gb002541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.