Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta

Stolzenburg, Mark R., McMurry, Peter H., Sakurai, Hiromu, Smith, James N., Mauldin, R. Lee, Eisele, Fred L., Clement, Charles F.·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

During the Atlanta ANARChE Study of July and August 2002, atmospheric aerosol size distributions from 3 to 2000 nm were measured continuously with 5‐min resolution. Sulfuric acid vapor concentrations were also measured. During regional nucleation events these data showed the presence of a nucleation mode that grew at rates ranging from 3 to 20 nm h−1. In this paper we compare these measured modal growth rates with calculated rates that account for sulfuric acid condensation, intramodal coagulation of nucleation mode particles, and extramodal coagulation of nucleation mode particles with preexisting particles. Data collected during six time intervals were amenable to analysis. Calculated and measured growth rates were in reasonable agreement for the four events that involved growth below 40 nm (ratios of measured to calculated growth rates = 1.0, 2.1, 0.68, 0.60). Two of the three afternoon events involved growth above 40 nm, and in these cases, measured rates substantially exceeded calculated rates by factors of four to five, suggesting that our model did not account for all growth processes. We also compared observed rates of change in nucleation mode number concentration with calculated coagulation rates during these six time intervals. During the sub‐40 nm growth events, particle concentrations changed at rates that were significantly below calculated coagulation rates. In two of these cases, particle concentrations increased during the growth period, suggesting that a source of particles was present. Measured size distributions suggest that particle production by nucleation continued during these events and contributed to this discrepancy. Concentrations during the super‐40 nm events decreased at rates that exceeded calculated coagulation rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd005935

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Sakurai, H., Smith, J. N., Mauldin, R. L., Eisele, F. L., & Clement, C. F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2005-11-09
Volume
110
Issue
D22
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013451606
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd005935
The paper
Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Sakurai, H., Smith, J. N., Mauldin, R. L., Eisele, F. L., & Clement, C. F. (2005). Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005935

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.