The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta
Abstract
During the Atlanta ANARChE Study of July and August 2002, atmospheric aerosol size distributions from 3 to 2000 nm were measured continuously with 5‐min resolution. Sulfuric acid vapor concentrations were also measured. During regional nucleation events these data showed the presence of a nucleation mode that grew at rates ranging from 3 to 20 nm h−1. In this paper we compare these measured modal growth rates with calculated rates that account for sulfuric acid condensation, intramodal coagulation of nucleation mode particles, and extramodal coagulation of nucleation mode particles with preexisting particles. Data collected during six time intervals were amenable to analysis. Calculated and measured growth rates were in reasonable agreement for the four events that involved growth below 40 nm (ratios of measured to calculated growth rates = 1.0, 2.1, 0.68, 0.60). Two of the three afternoon events involved growth above 40 nm, and in these cases, measured rates substantially exceeded calculated rates by factors of four to five, suggesting that our model did not account for all growth processes. We also compared observed rates of change in nucleation mode number concentration with calculated coagulation rates during these six time intervals. During the sub‐40 nm growth events, particle concentrations changed at rates that were significantly below calculated coagulation rates. In two of these cases, particle concentrations increased during the growth period, suggesting that a source of particles was present. Measured size distributions suggest that particle production by nucleation continued during these events and contributed to this discrepancy. Concentrations during the super‐40 nm events decreased at rates that exceeded calculated coagulation rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Formation of Urban Fine Particulate Matter
Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zamora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Hu, M., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067 · Cited by 1,426
Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., et al. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.091 · Cited by 678
Dependence of nucleation rates on sulfuric acid vapor concentration in diverse atmospheric locations
Kuang, C., McMurry, P. H., McCormick, A. V., & Eisele, F. L. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd009253 · Cited by 422
Self-citationA review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol
Hoyle, C. R., Boy, M., Donahue, N. M., Fry, J. L., Glasius, M., Guenther, A., Hallar, A. G., Huff Hartz, K., Petters, M. D., Petäjä, T., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-321-2011 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Sakurai, H., Smith, J. N., Mauldin, R. L., Eisele, F. L., & Clement, C. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-11-09
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- D22
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013451606
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd005935
- The paper
- Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Sakurai, H., Smith, J. N., Mauldin, R. L., Eisele, F. L., & Clement, C. F. (2005). Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.