Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stable isotopes in precipitation in the Asian monsoon region

Open access
Vuille, M., Werner, M., Bradley, R. S., Keimig, F.·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The influence of the Asian monsoon on the δ 18 O composition of precipitation is investigated on the basis of the ECHAM‐4 Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM), fitted with stable isotopic tracers. The model is forced with prescribed sea surface temperatures (SST) over the last few decades of the 20th century. The simulated climate and climate–stable isotope relationships are validated with observational data from the International Atomic Energy Agency–Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (IAEA‐GNIP) and reanalysis data. The model shows deficiencies when simulating interannual variations of monsoon precipitation, but the associated monsoon circulation is quite accurately reproduced, in particular when run in a high‐resolution (T106) version. The modeled stable isotope distribution is quite similar to observations, but the local climatic controls on δ 18 O are overestimated. The influence of the Asian monsoon on δ 18 O is analyzed on the basis of a vertical wind shear index M, indicative of variations in large‐scale monsoon strength. The ECHAM model simulates a significant negative relationship between δ 18 O composition of precipitation and M over most monsoon‐affected areas, consistent with the IAEA‐GNIP data. Variations in the amount of precipitation provide a first‐order explanation for this relationship. Distillation processes during transport and hence increased rainout and depletion of heavy isotopes upstream may also lead to a significant monsoon‐δ 18 O relationship in areas where local precipitation is not affected by monsoon variability. The modern δ 18 O record from the Dasuopu ice core in the Himalayas is a good indicator of the large‐scale monsoon circulation, a relationship that is correctly simulated by the T106 version of the ECHAM model. Our results suggest that δ 18 O variations in this region are sensitive to fluctuations in Asian monsoon intensity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd006022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Vuille, M., Werner, M., Bradley, R. S., & Keimig, F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2005-12-08
Volume
110
Issue
D23
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028972115
Cited by
256
References
1
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable isotopes in precipitation in the Asian monsoon region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006022
The paper
Vuille, M., Werner, M., Bradley, R. S., & Keimig, F. (2005). Stable isotopes in precipitation in the Asian monsoon region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.