Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column

Open access
Palmer, Paul I., Abbot, Dorian S., Fu, Tzung‐May, Jacob, Daniel J., Chance, Kelly, Kurosu, Thomas P., Guenther, Alex, Wiedinmyer, Christine, Stanton, Jenny C., Pilling, Michael J., Pressley, Shelley N., Lamb, Brian, Sumner, Anne Louise·2006·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Quantifying isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde (HCHO) columns is subject to errors involving the column retrieval and the assumed relationship between HCHO columns and isoprene emissions, taken here from the GEOS‐CHEM chemical transport model. Here we use a 6‐year (1996–2001) HCHO column data set from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) satellite instrument to (1) quantify these errors, (2) evaluate GOME‐derived isoprene emissions with in situ flux measurements and a process‐based emission inventory (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature, MEGAN), and (3) investigate the factors driving the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions. The error in the GOME HCHO column retrieval is estimated to be 40%. We use the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) to quantify the time‐dependent HCHO production from isoprene, α‐ and β‐pinenes, and methylbutenol and show that only emissions of isoprene are detectable by GOME. The time‐dependent HCHO yield from isoprene oxidation calculated by MCM is 20–30% larger than in GEOS‐CHEM. GOME‐derived isoprene fluxes track the observed seasonal variation of in situ measurements at a Michigan forest site with a −30% bias. The seasonal variation of North American isoprene emissions during 2001 inferred from GOME is similar to MEGAN, with GOME emissions typically 25% higher (lower) at the beginning (end) of the growing season. GOME and MEGAN both show a maximum over the southeastern United States, but they differ in the precise location. The observed interannual variability of this maximum is 20–30%, depending on month. The MEGAN isoprene emission dependence on surface air temperature explains 75% of the month‐to‐month variability in GOME‐derived isoprene emissions over the southeastern United States during May–September 1996–2001.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd006689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, P. I., Abbot, D. S., Fu, T., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Stanton, J. C., Pilling, M. J., Pressley, S. N., Lamb, B., & Sumner, A. L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2006-06-27
Volume
111
Issue
D12
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040153930
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006689
The paper
Palmer, P. I., Abbot, D. S., Fu, T., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., Guenther, A., Wiedinmyer, C., Stanton, J. C., Pilling, M. J., Pressley, S. N., Lamb, B., & Sumner, A. L. (2006). Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.