The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shrinking ponds in subarctic Alaska based on 1950–2002 remotely sensed images
Open accessAbstract
Over the past 50 years, Alaska has experienced a warming climate with longer growing seasons, increased potential evapotranspiration, and permafrost warming. Research from the Seward Peninsula and Kenai Peninsula has demonstrated a substantial landscape‐level trend in the reduction of surface water and number of closed‐basin ponds. We investigated whether this drying trend occurred at nine other regions throughout Alaska. One study region was from the Arctic Coastal Plain where deep permafrost occurs continuously across the landscape. The other eight study regions were from the boreal forest regions where discontinuous permafrost occurs. Mean annual precipitation across the study regions ranged from 100 to over 700 mm yr−1. We used remotely sensed imagery from the 1950s to 2002 to inventory over 10,000 closed‐basin ponds from at least three periods from this time span. We found a reduction in the area and number of shallow, closed‐basin ponds for all boreal regions. In contrast, the Arctic Coastal Plain region had negligible change in the area of closed‐basin ponds. Since the 1950s, surface water area of closed‐basin ponds included in this analysis decreased by 31 to 4 percent, and the total number of closed‐basin ponds surveyed within each study region decreased from 54 to 5 percent. There was a significant increasing trend in annual mean temperature and potential evapotranspiration since the 1950s for all study regions. There was no significant trend in annual precipitation during the same period. The regional trend of shrinking ponds may be due to increased drainage as permafrost warms, or increased evapotranspiration during a warmer and extended growing season.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic
Sturm, M., Racine, C., & Tape, K. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35079180 · Cited by 1,349
Cited by
Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change
McGuire, A. D., Anderson, L. G., Christensen, T. R., Dallimore, S., Guo, L., Hayes, D. J., Heimann, M., Lorenson, T. D., Macdonald, R. W., & Roulet, N. (2009) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/08-2025.1 · Cited by 984
Self-citationPermafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming
Koven, C. D., Ringeval, B., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Cadule, P., Khvorostyanov, D., Krinner, G., & Tarnocai, C. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1103910108 · Cited by 912
Jones, B. M., Grosse, G., Arp, C. D., Jones, M. C., Walter Anthony, K. M., & Romanovsky, V. E. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2011jg001666 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Riordan, B., Verbyla, D., & McGuire, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- G4
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169003346
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shrinking ponds in subarctic Alaska based on 1950–2002 remotely sensed images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jg000150
- The paper
- Riordan, B., Verbyla, D., & McGuire, A. D. (2006). Shrinking ponds in subarctic Alaska based on 1950–2002 remotely sensed images. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jg000150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.