The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments
Open accessAbstract
A new approach to regionalization of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models is presented on the basis of ensemble modeling and model averaging. It is argued that in principle, this approach represents an improvement on the established procedure of regressing parameter values against numeric catchment descriptors. Using daily data from 127 catchments in the United Kingdom, alternative schemes for defining prior and posterior likelihoods of candidate models are tested in terms of accuracy of ungauged catchment predictions. A probability distributed model structure is used, and alternative parameter sets are identified using data from each of a number of gauged catchments. Using the models of the 10 gauged catchments most similar to the ungauged catchment provides generally the best results and performs significantly better than the regression method, especially for predicting low flows. The ensemble of candidate models provides an indication of uncertainty in ungauged catchment predictions, although this is not a robust estimate of possible flow ranges, and frequently fails to encompass flow peaks. Options for developing the new method to resolve these problems are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation
Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900018 · Cited by 4,591
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. (1992) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/91wr02985 · Cited by 3,310
Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology
Singh, V. P. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,273
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model?
Jakeman, A. J., & Hornberger, G. M. (1993) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/93wr00877 · Cited by 1,216
The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin
Christensen, N. S., Wood, A. W., Voisin, N., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Palmer, R. N. (2004) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/b:clim.0000013684.13621.1f · Cited by 1,033
Regionalisation of catchment model parameters
Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2004) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028 · Cited by 715
Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Andréassian, V. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00393-0 · Cited by 632
The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales
MOORE, R. J. (1985) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626668509490989 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality
McMillan, H., Krueger, T., & Freer, J. (2012) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.9384 · Cited by 522
Cousins, I. T., Vestergren, R., Wang, Z., Scheringer, M., & McLachlan, M. S. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.044 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntyre, N., Lee, H., Wheater, H., Young, A., & Wagener, T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2108357489
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005wr004289
- The paper
- McIntyre, N., Lee, H., Wheater, H., Young, A., & Wagener, T. (2005). Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.