Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 697

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability

Thornton, Peter E., Lamarque, Jean‐François, Rosenbloom, Nan A., Mahowald, Natalie M.·2007·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Nutrient cycling affects carbon uptake by the terrestrial biosphere and imposes controls on carbon cycle response to variation in temperature and precipitation, but nutrient cycling is ignored in most global coupled models of the carbon cycle and climate system. We demonstrate here that the inclusion of nutrient cycle dynamics, specifically the close coupling between carbon and nitrogen cycles, in a terrestrial biogeochemistry component of a global coupled climate system model leads to fundamentally altered behavior for several of the most critical feedback mechanisms operating between the land biosphere and the global climate system. Carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling reduces the simulated global terrestrial carbon uptake response to increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration by 74%, relative to a carbon‐only counterpart model. Global integrated responses of net land carbon exchange to variation in temperature and precipitation are significantly damped by carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling. The carbon cycle responses to temperature and precipitation variation are reduced in magnitude as atmospheric CO 2 concentration rises for the coupled carbon‐nitrogen model, but increase in magnitude for the carbon‐only counterpart. Our results suggest that previous carbon‐only treatments of climate‐carbon cycle coupling likely overestimate the terrestrial biosphere's capacity to ameliorate atmospheric CO 2 increases through direct fertilization. The next generation of coupled climate‐biogeochemistry model projections for future atmospheric CO 2 concentration and climate change should include explicit, prognostic treatment of terrestrial carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gb002868

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 697

Metadata

Authors
Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J., Rosenbloom, N. A., & Mahowald, N. M.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2007-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1899964430
Cited by
697
References
3
FWCI
34.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006gb002868
The paper
Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J., Rosenbloom, N. A., & Mahowald, N. M. (2007). Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002868

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.