The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability
Abstract
Nutrient cycling affects carbon uptake by the terrestrial biosphere and imposes controls on carbon cycle response to variation in temperature and precipitation, but nutrient cycling is ignored in most global coupled models of the carbon cycle and climate system. We demonstrate here that the inclusion of nutrient cycle dynamics, specifically the close coupling between carbon and nitrogen cycles, in a terrestrial biogeochemistry component of a global coupled climate system model leads to fundamentally altered behavior for several of the most critical feedback mechanisms operating between the land biosphere and the global climate system. Carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling reduces the simulated global terrestrial carbon uptake response to increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration by 74%, relative to a carbon‐only counterpart model. Global integrated responses of net land carbon exchange to variation in temperature and precipitation are significantly damped by carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling. The carbon cycle responses to temperature and precipitation variation are reduced in magnitude as atmospheric CO 2 concentration rises for the coupled carbon‐nitrogen model, but increase in magnitude for the carbon‐only counterpart. Our results suggest that previous carbon‐only treatments of climate‐carbon cycle coupling likely overestimate the terrestrial biosphere's capacity to ameliorate atmospheric CO 2 increases through direct fertilization. The next generation of coupled climate‐biogeochemistry model projections for future atmospheric CO 2 concentration and climate change should include explicit, prognostic treatment of terrestrial carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2001) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00175.x · Cited by 684
Cited by
The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011 · Cited by 1,545
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013 · Cited by 1,084
The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality
McDowell, N. G., Beerling, D. J., Breshears, D. D., Fisher, R. A., Raffa, K. F., & Stitt, M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,020
Increased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2
van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W., & Hungate, B. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10176 · Cited by 551
Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake
Keenan, T. F., Prentice, I. C., Canadell, J. G., Williams, C. A., Wang, H., Raupach, M., & Collatz, G. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13428 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J., Rosenbloom, N. A., & Mahowald, N. M.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1899964430
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006gb002868
- The paper
- Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J., Rosenbloom, N. A., & Mahowald, N. M. (2007). Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.