The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model
Abstract
Abstract Disturbances from fire, wind‐throw, insects and other herbivores are, besides climate, CO2, and soils, critical factors for composition, structure and dynamics of most vegetation. To simulate the influence of fire on the dynamic equilibrium, as well as on potential change, of vegetation at the global scale, we have developed a fire model, running inside the modular framework of the Lund–Potsdam–Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM). Estimated litter moisture is the main driver of day‐to‐day fire probability. The length of the fire season is used to estimate the fractional area of a grid cell which is burnt in a given year. This affected area is converted into an average fire return interval which can be compared to observations. When driven by observed climate for the 20th century (at a 0.5° longitude/latitude resolution), the model yielded fire return intervals in good agreement with observations for many regions (except parts of semiarid Africa and boreal Siberia). We suggest that further improvement for these regions must involve additional process descriptions such as permafrost and fuel/fire dynamics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thonicke et al. assume a correlation between fire season and area burned that is not apparent in our data.
“Thonicke et al. (34) assume a correlation between fire season and area burned that is not apparent in our data”
From Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes (2013) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States
Balch, J. K., Bradley, B. A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Nagy, R. C., Fusco, E. J., & Mahood, A. L. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1617394114 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity
Moritz, M. A., Parisien, M.-A., Batllori, E., Krawchuk, M. A., Van Dorn, J., Ganz, D. J., & Hayhoe, K. (2012) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es11-00345.1 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Landscape—wildfire interactions in southern Europe: implications for landscape management
Moreira, F., Viedma, O., Arianoutsou, M., Curt, T., Koutsias, N., Rigolot, E., Barbati, A., Corona, P., Vaz, P., Xanthopoulos, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.028 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Environmental drivers of large, infrequent wildfires: The emerging conceptual model
Meyn, A., White, P. S., Buhk, C., & Jentsch, A. (2007) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133307079365 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Impact of human population density on fire frequency at the global scale
Knorr, W., Kaminski, T., Arneth, A., & Weber, U. (2014) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-11-1085-2014 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Forkel, M., Andela, N., Harrison, S. P., Lasslop, G., van Marle, M., Chuvieco, E., Dorigo, W., Forrest, M., Hantson, S., Heil, A., et al. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-57-2019 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationPathways for climate change effects on fire: models, data, and uncertainties
Hessl, A. E. (2011) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133311407654 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Using the Paleorecord to Evaluate Climate and Fire Interactions in Australia
Lynch, A. H., Beringer, J., Kershaw, P., Marshall, A., Mooney, S., Tapper, N., Turney, C., & Van Der Kaars, S. (2007) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.35.092006.145055 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Predicting pan-tropical climate change induced forest stock gains and losses – implications for REDD
Gumpenberger, M., Vohland, K., Heyder, U., Poulter, B., Macey, K., Rammig, A., Popp, A., & Cramer, W. (2010) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014013 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests of Myanmar—Analysis Using MODIS Satellite Datasets
Biswas, S., Lasko, K. D., & Vadrevu, K. P. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2015.2423681 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W.
- Affiliations
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Thonicke, Kirsten
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2136881308
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Ecology and Biogeography (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- fire disturbance, fire return interval, dynamic global vegetation models, fire models, litter moisture, fire season length, vegetation-climate interactions, permafrost, fuel dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
