Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 694

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite‐frequency tomography

Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F. A., Masters, G.·2006·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Abstract

New finite‐frequency tomographic images of S‐wave velocity confirm the existence of deep mantle plumes below a large number of known hot spots. We compare S‐anomaly images with an updated P‐anomaly model. Deep mantle plumes are present beneath Ascension, Azores, Canary, Cape Verde, Cook Island, Crozet, Easter, Kerguelen, Hawaii, Samoa, and Tahiti. Afar, Atlantic Ridge, Bouvet(Shona), Cocos/Keeling, Louisville, and Reunion are shown to originate at least below the upper mantle if not much deeper. Plumes that reach only to midmantle are present beneath Bowie, Hainan, Eastern Australia, and Juan Fernandez; these plumes may have tails too thin to observe in the lowermost mantle, but the images are also consistent with an interpretation as “dying plumes” that have exhausted their source region. In the tomographic images, only the Eifel and Seychelles plumes are unambiguously confined to the upper mantle. Starting plumes are visible in the lowermost mantle beneath South of Java, East of Solomon, and in the Coral Sea. All imaged plumes are wide and fail to show plumeheads, suggesting a very weakly temperature‐dependent viscosity for lower mantle minerals, and/or compositional variations. The S‐wave velocity images show several minor differences with respect to the earlier P‐wave results, including plume conduits that extend down to the core‐mantle boundary beneath Cape Verde, Cook Island, and Kerguelen. A more substantial disagreement between P‐wave and S‐wave images reopens the question on the depth extent of the Iceland plume. We suggest that a pulsating behavior of the plume may explain the shape of the conduit beneath Iceland.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gc001248

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 694

Metadata

Authors
Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F. A., & Masters, G.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2006-11
Volume
7
Issue
11
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1621537172
Cited by
694
References
1
FWCI
28.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite‐frequency tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006gc001248
The paper
Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F. A., & Masters, G. (2006). A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite‐frequency tomography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gc001248

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.