The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An improved C‐band scatterometer ocean geophysical model function: CMOD5
Open accessAbstract
In this paper CMOD5, a new C‐band geophysical model function (GMF), is derived on the basis of measurements from the scatterometer on board of the European Remote Sensing Satellite ERS‐2. First‐guess winds from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts were used as a reference for the period from August to December 1998, adding up to more than 22,000,000 collocations. CMOD5 corrects some deficiencies of the currently widely used CMOD4 GMF. Linear and higher‐order wind speed corrections as computed with a triple collocation method are implemented. Recent measurements of extreme backscatter and wind obtained by aircraft and in situ data are fitted. Also, a more accurate fit of the two‐dimensional cone surface in three‐dimensional measurement space is established, especially in the regime of strong winds. These improvements result not only in better wind retrievals at high wind speed, but also in a more uniform performance across the ERS scatterometer swath. Moreover, the wind ambiguity problem has been reduced owing to the improved fit of the cone surface, resulting in about 75% skill of the first rank solution for winds above 10 m/s. These improvements aid the general usefulness of retrieved C‐band scatterometer winds for climate and weather applications, and the ambiguity removal in dynamical and extreme weather conditions in particular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward the true near‐surface wind speed: Error modeling and calibration using triple collocation
Stoffelen, A. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/97jc03180 · Cited by 891
Self-citationScatterometer data interpretation: Estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4
Stoffelen, A., & Anderson, D. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/96jc02860 · Cited by 574
Self-citationEvaluation of Wind Vectors Observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds Using Ocean Buoy Data
Ebuchi, N., Graber, H. C., & Caruso, M. J. (2002) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<2049:eowvob>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 345
Wentz, F. J., & Smith, D. K. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/98jc02148 · Cited by 304
Chelton, D. B., & Freilich, M. H. (2005) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr-2861.1 · Cited by 281
Intercomparison of the Performance of Operational Ocean Wave Forecasting Systems with Buoy Data
Bidlot, J.-R., Holmes, D. J., Wittmann, P. A., Lalbeharry, R., & Chen, H. S. (2002) · Weather and Forecasting · doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0287:iotpoo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 241
The accuracy of the NSCAT 1 vector winds: Comparisons with National Data Buoy Center buoys
Freilich, M. H., & Dunbar, R. S. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1998jc900091 · Cited by 234
Scatterometer Data Interpretation: Measurement Space and Inversion
Stoffelen, A., & Anderson, D. (1997) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<1298:sdimsa>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 204
Self-citationRevised ocean backscatter models at C and Ku band under high‐wind conditions
Donnelly, W. J., Carswell, J. R., McIntosh, R. E., Chang, P. S., Wilkerson, J. C., Marks, F. D., & Black, P. G. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1998jc900030 · Cited by 160
ERS scatterometer wind data impact on ECMWF's tropical cyclone forecasts
Isaksen, L., & Stoffelen, A. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.851771 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Cited by
An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations
Naeimi, V., Scipal, K., Bartalis, Z., Hasenauer, S., & Wagner, W. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2008.2011617 · Cited by 429
Spaceborne GNSS-R Minimum Variance Wind Speed Estimator
Clarizia, M. P., Ruf, C. S., Jales, P., & Gommenginger, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2303831 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Hersbach, H., Stoffelen, A., & de Haan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- C3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093761294
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 19.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved C‐band scatterometer ocean geophysical model function: CMOD5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jc003743
- The paper
- Hersbach, H., Stoffelen, A., & de Haan, S. (2007). An improved C‐band scatterometer ocean geophysical model function: CMOD5. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jc003743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.