Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oceanic distribution and sources of bromoform and dibromomethane in the Mauritanian upwelling

Quack, Birgit, Peeken, Ilka, Petrick, Gert, Nachtigall, Kerstin·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

The tropical oceans are a source of reactive bromine to the atmosphere in the form of short‐lived brominated methanes as bromoform (CHBr 3) and dibromomethane (CH 2 Br 2). Elevated atmospheric concentrations above the tropical oceans are related to oceanic supersaturations of the compounds and especially to upwelling regimes. Although the sources of these brominated gases in the open ocean are not well understood, they have been habitually linked to phytoplankton, especially diatom abundance. Thus according to common assumptions, high concentrations of the brominated trace gases were expected to occur in the biologically active and diatom‐rich Mauritanian upwelling. However, contrary to expectations, only low levels were encountered in the upwelling waters, 10.7 (range 5.2–23.8) pmol L−1 CHBr 3 and 4.7 (range 3.1–7.0) pmol L−1 CH 2 Br 2, values more typical of open ocean concentrations. The aqueous CHBr 3 concentrations were not correlated to high chlorophyll a values or diatom abundances. However, significant correlations existed with low concentrations of marker pigments for diatoms, cyanobacteria, and degradation, suggesting miscellaneous small biological sources of the compound in the upwelling. Air‐sea exchange could additionally account for an oceanic source in fresh upwelled waters, while advection of different water masses also influenced the distribution. CHBr 3 concentrations were maximized in warm and nitrogen‐depleted surface waters, while CH 2 Br 2 was maximized in colder and nitrogen‐enriched deeper waters, suggesting that both compounds, at least in part, have different sources and fates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jc003803

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Geen C. E.(1992) Selected marine sources and sinks of bromoform and other low molecular weight organobromines Ph.D. thesis 109 pp Dalhousie Univ. Halifax N. S. Canada.
  2. Postel L., 1987, Einfluß des Nouakchott‐Canyons (Mauretanien) auf ozeanologische Feldverteilungen im Marz 1984, 1. Einführung und Meßprogramm, Beitr. Meeresk., 57, 45
  3. Wade L. G., 1999, Organic Chemistry

Metadata

Authors
Quack, B., Peeken, I., Petrick, G., & Nachtigall, K.
Affiliations
Department of Marine Biogeochemistry Leibniz‐Institute of Marine Sciences Kiel Germany
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2007-10
Volume
112
Issue
C10
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
42
References
50
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oceanic distribution and sources of bromoform and dibromomethane in the Mauritanian upwelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jc003803
The paper
Quack, B., Peeken, I., Petrick, G., & Nachtigall, K. (2007). Oceanic distribution and sources of bromoform and dibromomethane in the Mauritanian upwelling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jc003803

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.