Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States

Open access
Tagaris, Efthimios, Manomaiphiboon, Kasemsan, Liao, Kuo‐Jen, Leung, L. Ruby, Woo, Jung‐Hun, He, Shan, Amar, Praveen, Russell, Armistead G.·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Simulated future summers (i.e., 2049–2051) and annual (i.e., 2050) average regional O 3 and PM 2.5 concentrations over the United States are compared with historic (i.e., 2000–2002 summers and all of 2001) levels to investigate the potential impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional air quality. Meteorological inputs to the CMAQ chemical transport model are developed by downscaling the GISS Global Climate Model simulations using an MM5‐based regional climate model. Future‐year emissions for North America are developed by growing the U.S. EPA CAIR inventory, Mexican and Canadian emissions and by using the IMAGE model with the IPCC A1B emissions scenario that is also used in projecting future climate. Reductions of more than 50% in NO X and SO 2 emissions are forecast. Impacts of global climate change alone on regional air quality are small compared to impacts from emission control‐related reductions, although increases in pollutant concentrations due to stagnation and other factors are found. The combined effect of climate change and emission reductions lead to a 20% decrease (regionally varying from −11% to −28%) in the mean summer maximum daily 8‐hour ozone levels (M8hO 3) over the United States. Mean annual PM 2.5 concentrations are estimated to be 23% lower (varies from −9% to −32%). Major reductions in sulfate, nitrate and ammonium PM 2.5 components combined with the limited reduction in organic carbon suggests that organic carbon will be the dominant component of PM 2.5 mass in the future. Regionally, the eastern United States benefits more than the rest of the regions from reductions in both M8hO 3 and PM 2.5, because of both spatial variations in the meteorological and emissions changes. Reduction in the higher M8hO 3 concentrations is also estimated for all subregions and fewer days with M8hO 3 above the air quality standards in urban sites with Atlanta in the southeast benefiting most.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jd008262

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Tagaris, E., Manomaiphiboon, K., Liao, K., Leung, L. R., Woo, J., He, S., Amar, P., & Russell, A. G.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2007-07-27
Volume
112
Issue
D14
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980983226
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd008262
The paper
Tagaris, E., Manomaiphiboon, K., Liao, K., Leung, L. R., Woo, J., He, S., Amar, P., & Russell, A. G. (2007). Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.