Cited by 282Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies

Abstract

Data taken in aircraft transects of emissions plumes from rural U.S. coal-fired power plants were used to confirm and quantify the nonlinear dependence of tropospheric ozone formation on plume NO(x) (NO plus NO(2)) concentration, which is determined by plant NO(x) emission rate and atmospheric dispersion. The ambient availability of reactive volatile organic compounds, principally biogenic isoprene, was also found to modulate ozone production rate and yield in these rural plumes. Differences of a factor of 2 or greater in plume ozone formation rates and yields as a function of NO(x) and volatile organic compound concentrations were consistently observed. These large differences suggest that consideration of power plant NO(x) emission rates and geographic locations in current and future U.S. ozone control strategies could substantially enhance the efficacy of NO(x) reductions from these sources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1058113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in ozone concentrations depend strongly on dispersion of precursor emissions due to nonlinearity in the relationship between ozone production rates and NOx concentration.

    “In addition, changes in ozone concentrations depend strongly on dispersion of precursor emissions due to nonlinearity in the relationship between ozone production rates and NO x concentration (Marelle et al., 2016; Ryerson et al., 2001).”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Ryerson et al., 2001

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Haagen-Smit A. J., Industr. Eng. Chem. 44, 1342 (1952). · DOI
  2. Crutzen P. J., Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 7, 443 (1979). · DOI
  3. Fiore A. M., Jacob D. J., Logan J. A., Yin J. H., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 1471 (1998). · DOI
  4. Trainer M., et al., Nature 329, 705 (1987). · DOI
  5. Chameides W. L., Lindsay R. W., Richardson J., Kiang C. S., Science 241, 1473 (1988). · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.276.5314.916 · DOI
  7. St. John J. C., Chameides W. L., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 9203 (2000). · DOI
  8. Liu S. C., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 92, 4191 (1987). · DOI
  9. Miller D. F., Alkezweeny A. J., Hales J. M., Lee R. N., Science 202, 1186 (1978). · DOI
  10. Gillani N. V., Pleim J. E., Atmos. Environ. 30, 2043 (1996). · DOI
  11. Ryerson T. B., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 22569 (1998). · DOI
  12. Goldan P. D., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 9091 (2000). · DOI
  13. Jacob D. J., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 101, 24235 (1996). · DOI
  14. Parrish D. D., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 98, 2927 (1993). · DOI
  15. Pleim J. E., Chang J. S., Zhang K., J. Geophys. Res. 96, 3065 (1991). · DOI
  16. Ryerson T. B., Williams E. J., Fehsenfeld F. C., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 26447 (2000). · DOI
  17. Fahey D. W., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 91, 9781 (1986). · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.259.5100.1436 · DOI
  19. Wofsy S. C., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 99, 1887 (1994). · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.959846 · DOI
  21. Trainer M., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 100, 18823 (1995). · DOI
  22. Geron C. D., Guenther A. B., Pierce T. E., J. Geophys. Res. 99, 12773 (1994). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ryerson, T. B., Trainer, M., Holloway, J. S., Parrish, D. D., Huey, L. G., Sueper, D. T., Frost, G. J., Donnelly, S. G., Schauffler, S., Atlas, E. L., Kuster, W. C., Goldan, P. D., Hübler, G., Meagher, J. F., & Fehsenfeld, F. C.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Aeronomy Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Corresponding author
  • Ryerson, T. B.
  • Trainer, M.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-04-27
Volume
292
Issue
5517
Pages
719-723
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2101806285
Cited by
282
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
tropospheric ozone formation, power plant emissions, coal-fired power plants, NOx emissions, isoprene, volatile organic compounds, ozone control strategies, atmospheric dispersion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review