Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synchrotron x-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of NAPL-water interfacial areas

Brusseau, Mark L., Janousek, Hilary, Murao, Asami, Schnaar, Gregory·2008·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Interfacial areas between an immiscible organic liquid (NAPL), and water were measured for two natural porous media using two methods, aqueous‐phase interfacial partitioning tracer tests and synchrotron X‐ray microtomography. The interfacial areas measured with the tracer tests were similar to previously reported values obtained with the method. The values were, however, significantly larger than those obtained from microtomography. Analysis of microtomography data collected before and after introduction of the interfacial tracer solution indicated that the surfactant tracer had minimal impact on fluid‐phase configuration and interfacial areas under conditions associated with typical laboratory application. The disparity between the tracer test and microtomography values is attributed primarily to the inability of the microtomography method to resolve interfacial area associated with microscopic surface heterogeneity. This hypothesis is consistent with results recently reported for a comparison of microtomographic analysis and interfacial tracer tests conducted for an air‐water system. The tracer test method provides a measure of effective, total (capillary and film) interfacial area, whereas microtomography can be used to determine separately both capillary‐associated and film‐associated interfacial areas. Both methods appear to provide useful information for given applications. A key to their effective use is recognizing the specific nature of the information provided by each, as well as associated limitations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006wr005517

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Setting Kni equal to Kai for PFOA and PFOS is a reasonable first approximation, supported by the similarity of Kni and Kai values measured for SDBS.

    “This is a reasonable first approximation, supported by the similarity of Kni and Kai values measured for a common surfactant used as an interfacial partitioning tracer, SDBS (Brusseau et al., 2007,2008, 2010).”

    From Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface (2018) · cites this paper as Brusseau et al., 2008

    The Materials and Methods (§2, ¶7) identify SDBS as an interfacial partitioning tracer for NAPL–water measurements. The paper does not report a comparison of SDBS’s NAPL–water and air–water partition coefficients, so it does not establish the similarity offered to justify the approximation for PFOA and PFOS. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.12.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00043-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1012032723166 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80007-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/es960475j · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1029/2005WR004058 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/es061474m · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1029/2003GL019282 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.042 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1029/2001WR000738 · DOI
  11. 10.1029/2004WR003278 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.021 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00202-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/es050037p · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1029/91WR00303 · DOI
  16. 10.1029/93WR01495 · DOI
  17. Israelachvili J., 1992, Intermolecular and Surface Forces
  18. 10.1021/es020550s · DOI
  19. 10.1021/la950821v · DOI
  20. 10.1130/GES00001.1 · DOI
  21. 10.2136/sssaj1999.6361554x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Leverett M. C., 1941, Capillary behavior in porous solids, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., 142, 152
  23. 10.1021/ie50726a006 · DOI
  24. 10.1029/1999WR900262 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1029/2004WR003233 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1021/j100501a012 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/92WR00984 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.11.053 · DOI
  29. 10.1029/96WR01105 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/es960652g · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00052-1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1006/jcis.1999.6604 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Schnaar G.(2006) Pore‐scale characterization of organic immiscible liquid in natural porous media using synchrotron X‐ray microtomography Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Ariz. Tucson. · DOI
  34. 10.1021/es0508370 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/es0602851 · DOI
  36. 10.2136/vzj2005.0063 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.025 · DOI
  38. Sutton S. R., 2002, Applications of Synchrotron Radiation in Low‐Temperature Geochemistry and Environmental Sciences, 429, 10.1515/9781501508882-014 · DOI
  39. 10.2136/vzj2003.3220 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/cjce.5450630401 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00157-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brusseau, M. L., Janousek, H., Murao, A., & Schnaar, G.
Affiliations
Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2008-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0043-1397
  • 1944-7973
Cited by
51
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review