The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fine‐resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies
Open accessAbstract
A new data set enhances the abilities of researchers and decision‐makers to assess possible future climates, explore societal impacts, and approach policy responses from a risk‐based perspective. The data set, which consists of a library of 112 fine‐resolution climate projections, based on 16 climate models and three greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, is now publicly available. Monthly climate projections from 1950 to 2099 were downscaled to a spatial resolution of ⅛° (about 140 square kilometers per grid cell) covering the conterminous United States and portions of Canada and Mexico. For the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, climate modeling groups produced hundreds of simulations of past and future climates. The colocation of these simulations in a single archive (at the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), established to facilitate assessment of general circulation models, or GCMs) and the conversion of all results to a common data format have made probabilistic, multi‐model projections and impact assessments practical. A remaining issue is that the spatial scale of climate model output is typically too coarse for regional impact studies. Multiple downscaling approaches exist for deriving regional climate from coarse‐resolution model output; these approaches are typically applied on an ad hoc basis to a particular region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies
Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane, A. C., Boote, K. J., Thorburn, P., Antle, J. M., Nelson, G. C., Porter, C., Janssen, S., et al. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,048
Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change
Auffhammer, M., Hsiang, S. M., Schlenker, W., & Sobel, A. (2013) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/ret016 · Cited by 662
Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change*
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Maurer, E. P., Abatzoglou, J. T., & Hegewisch, K. C. (2015) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-14-0236.1 · Cited by 332
Self-citationBerardy, A., & Chester, M. V. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5e6d · Cited by 110
Fernald, A., Tidwell, V., Rivera, J., Rodríguez, S., Guldan, S., Steele, C., Ochoa, C., Hurd, B., Ortiz, M., Boykin, K., et al. (2012) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su4112998 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Maurer, E. P., Brekke, L., Pruitt, T., & Duffy, P. B.
- Venue
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-11-20
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 504-504
- ISSN
- 0096-3941 (ISSN-L)
- 2324-9250
- OpenAlex
- W2026656626
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine‐resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007eo470006
- The paper
- Maurer, E. P., Brekke, L., Pruitt, T., & Duffy, P. B. (2007). Fine‐resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007eo470006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.