Cited by 662Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate variability and modelsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change

Open access
Auffhammer, Maximilian, Hsiang, Solomon M., Schlenker, Wolfram, Sobel, Adam·2013·Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Abstract

Economists are increasingly using weather data and climate model output in analyses of the economic impacts of climate change. This article introduces weather data sets and climate models that are frequently used, discusses the most common mistakes economists make in using these products, and identifies ways to avoid these pitfalls. We first provide an introduction to weather data, including a summary of the types of data sets available, and then we discuss five common pitfalls that empirical researchers should be aware of when using historical weather data as explanatory variables in econometric applications. We then provide a brief overview of climate models and discuss two common and significant errors often made by economists when climate model output is used to simulate the future impacts of climate change on an economic outcome of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/reep/ret016

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not accounting for spatial and temporal autocorrelation might produce biased error estimates.

    “Spatial and temporal autocorrelation are of high relevance for modelling and not accounting for the correlation of climatic and other variables might produce biased error estimates (Auffhammer et al., 2013).”

    From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Auffhammer et al., 2013

    In “Issue 4: Spatial Correlation” (page unavailable), the paper says that failing to correct for spatial correlation biases standard-error estimates. It notes that climate variables are correlated across both space and time, but does not establish the same error-estimate consequence for temporal autocorrelation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If correlated climatic variables are not simultaneously considered, this may lead to omitted variable biases.

    “If correlated climatic variables are not simultaneously considered, this may lead to omitted variable biases (Auffhammer et al. 2013;Berlemann and Steinhardt 2017;Hsiang 2016).”
  • Because climatic events are correlated, the estimated effects might plausibly pick up the effect of other not-included, but correlated climatic events, which would result in an omitted variable bias.

    “First, because climatic events are correlated, the estimated effects might plausibly pick up the effect of other notincluded, but correlated climatic events, which would result in an omitted variable bias (Auffhammer et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Donner, L. Schubert W. and Somerville, R. 2011. The Development of Atmospheric General Circulation Models. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  2. Kistler, Robert, Eugenia Kalnay, William Collins, Suranjana Saha, Glenn White, John Woollen, Muthuvel Chelliah, Wesley Ebisuzaki, Masao Kanamitsu, Vernon Kousky, Huug van den Dool, Roy Jenne, and Michael Fiorino. 2001. "The NCEP-NCAR 50- Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82: 247-267.
  3. Lobell D. and Burke M. Springer.
  4. Weart, S. 2011. General Circulation Models of Climate. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/GCM.htm

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auffhammer, M., Hsiang, S. M., Schlenker, W., & Sobel, A.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Auffhammer, Maximilian
  • Hsiang, Solomon M.
  • Schlenker, Wolfram
  • Sobel, Adam
Venue
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
181-198
ISSN
  • 1750-6816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-6824
OpenAlex
W2081198062
Cited by
662
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
72.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1008847)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0208ER64640)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
meteorological observations, climate model output, economic impacts of climate change, climate change projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review