The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global N removal by freshwater aquatic systems using a spatially distributed, within‐basin approach
Open accessAbstract
We explored the role of aquatic systems in the global N cycle using a spatially distributed, within‐basin, aquatic nitrogen (N) removal model, implemented within the Framework for Aquatic Modeling in the Earth System (FrAMES‐N). The model predicts mean annual total N (TN) removal by small rivers (with drainage areas from 2.6–1000 km 2), large rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, using a 30′ latitude × longitude river network to route and process material from continental source areas to the coastal zone. Mean annual aquatic TN removal (for the mid‐1990s time period) is determined by the distributions of aquatic TN inputs, mean annual hydrological characteristics, and biological activity. Model‐predicted TN concentrations at basin mouths corresponded well with observations (median relative error = −12%, interquartile range of relative error = 85%), an improvement over assumptions of uniform aquatic removal across basins. Removal by aquatic systems globally accounted for 14% of total N inputs to continental surfaces, but represented 53% of inputs to aquatic systems. Integrated aquatic removal was similar in small rivers (16.5% of inputs), large rivers (13.6%), and lakes (15.2%), while large reservoirs were less important (5.2%). Bias related to runoff suggests improvements are needed in nonpoint N input estimates and/or aquatic biological activity. The within‐basin approach represented by FrAMES‐N will improve understanding of the freshwater nutrient flux response to anthropogenic change at global scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804901 · Cited by 2,965
Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,679
Self-citationGulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. “The Dead Zone.”
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., & Wiseman, W. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150513 · Cited by 1,330
Cited by
Covino, T. (2017) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.030 · Cited by 328
Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams
DEMARS, B. O. L., RUSSELL MANSON, J., ÓLAFSSON, J. S., GÍSLASON, G. M., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, R., WOODWARD, G., REISS, J., PICHLER, D. E., RASMUSSEN, J. J., & FRIBERG, N. (2011) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02554.x · Cited by 273
Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social-economic-environmental system
Davies, E. G. R., & Simonovic, S. P. (2011) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.010 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Wollheim, W. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Bouwman, A. F., Green, P., Harrison, J., Linder, E., Peterson, B. J., Seitzinger, S. P., & Syvitski, J. P. M.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2165360549
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global N removal by freshwater aquatic systems using a spatially distributed, within‐basin approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007gb002963
- The paper
- Wollheim, W. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Bouwman, A. F., Green, P., Harrison, J., Linder, E., Peterson, B. J., Seitzinger, S. P., & Syvitski, J. P. M. (2008). Global N removal by freshwater aquatic systems using a spatially distributed, within‐basin approach. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gb002963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.