Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams

DEMARS, BENOÎT O.L., RUSSELL MANSON, J., ÓLAFSSON, JON S., GÍSLASON, GÍSLI M., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, RAKEL, WOODWARD, GUY, REISS, JULIA, PICHLER, DORIS E., RASMUSSEN, JES J., FRIBERG, NIKOLAI·2011·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

1. It is becoming increasingly clear that fresh waters play a major role in the global C cycle. Stream ecosystem respiration (ER) and gross primary productivity (GPP) exert a significant control on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. However, little is known about how climate change will influence these fluxes. 2. Here, we used a ‘natural experiment’ to demonstrate the role of temperature and nutrient cycling in whole-system metabolism (ER, GPP and net ecosystem production – NEP), in naturally heated geothermal (5–25 °C) Icelandic streams. 3. We calculated ER and GPP with a new, more accurate method, which enabled us to take into account the additional uncertainties owing to stream spatial heterogeneity in oxygen concentrations within a reach. ER ranged 1–25 g C m−2 day−1 and GPP 1–10 g C m−2 day−1. The median uncertainties (based on 1 SD) in ER and GPP were 50% and 20%, respectively. 4. Despite extremely low water nutrient concentrations, high metabolic rates in the warm streams were supported by fast cycling rates of nutrients, as revealed from inorganic nutrient (N, P) addition experiments. 5. ER exceeded GPP in all streams (with average GPP/ER = 0.6) and was more strongly related to temperature than GPP, resulting in elevated negative NEP with warming. We show that, as a first approximation based on summer investigations, global stream carbon emission to the atmosphere would nearly double from 0.12 Pg C year−1 at 13 °C to 0.21 (0.15–0.33) Pg C year−1 with a 5 °C warming. 6. Compared to previous studies from natural systems (including terrestrial ecosystems), the temperature dependence of stream metabolism was not confounded by latitude or altitude, seasonality, light and nutrient availability, water chemistry, space availability (water transient storage), and water availability. 7. Consequently, stream nutrient processing is likely to increase with warming, protecting downstream ecosystems (rivers, estuaries, coastal marine systems) during the summer low flows from nutrient enrichment, but at the cost of increased CO2 flux back to the atmosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02554.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
DEMARS, B. O. L., RUSSELL MANSON, J., ÓLAFSSON, J. S., GÍSLASON, G. M., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, R., WOODWARD, G., REISS, J., PICHLER, D. E., RASMUSSEN, J. J., & FRIBERG, N.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-26
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1106-1121
ISSN
0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1806136744
Cited by
273
References
58
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02554.x
The paper
DEMARS, B. O. L., RUSSELL MANSON, J., ÓLAFSSON, J. S., GÍSLASON, G. M., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, R., WOODWARD, G., REISS, J., PICHLER, D. E., RASMUSSEN, J. J., & FRIBERG, N. (2011). Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02554.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.