Cited by 103Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchClimate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Is the number of North Atlantic tropical cyclones significantly underestimated prior to the availability of satellite observations?

Open access
Chang, Edmund K. M., Guo, Yanjuan·2007·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The number of North Atlantic tropical cyclones that may have been undetected before satellite observations are available is estimated by passing the cyclone tracks taken from 1976 to 2005 through ship observations from 1900 to 1965. The probability of detection is equated to the probability that the ships would have made wind observations of 18 m/s or higher had the tropical cyclones been present during the earlier years, based on the probability computed from actual wind observations around tropical cyclones during the satellite era. It is estimated that the number of tropical cyclones not making landfall over any continent or the Caribbeans may have been underestimated by up to 2.1 per year during 1904–1913, with this number decreasing to 1.0 per year or less during the 1920s and later decades. Our results suggest that the characteristics of North Atlantic tropical cyclone track statistics might have changed during the 20th century.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007gl030169

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Before satellite monitoring became routine in the late 1970s, tropical cyclones were prone to be missed if they were not observed through landfall, a ship, or airplane reconnaissance.

    “However, before satellite monitoring became routine in the late 1970s, tropical cyclones were prone to be missed if they were not observed through landfall, a ship, or airplane reconnaissance.13,14”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, E. K. M., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2007-07
Volume
34
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1975467086
Cited by
103
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
North Atlantic tropical cyclones, tropical cyclone detection, satellite observations, tropical cyclone tracks, Caribbean, 20th century climate change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review