The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of isoprene to chemical budgets: A model tracer study with the NCAR CTM MOZART‐4
Open accessAbstract
We present a study of the sensitivity of isoprene emission calculations in a global chemistry transport model (CTM) to input land cover characteristics and analyze the impacts of changes in isoprene on the tropospheric budgets of atmospheric key species. The CTM Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Species, version 4 (MOZART‐4) includes the online calculation of isoprene emissions based on the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN), which is driven by three different land parameter inputs. We also included a tagging scheme in the CTM, which keeps track of the production of carbon containing species from isoprene oxidation. It is found that the amount of tropospheric carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde (HCHO) and peroxyacetylnitrate (PAN) explained by isoprene oxidation ranges from 9–16%, 15–27%, and 22–32%, depending on the isoprene emissions scenario. Changes in the global tropospheric burden with different land cover inputs can reach up to 10% for CO, 15% for HCHO, and 20% for PAN. Changes for ozone are small on a global scale, but regionally differences are as large as 3DU in the tropospheric column and as large as 5 ppbv in the surface concentrations. Our results demonstrate that a careful integration of isoprene emissions and chemistry in CTMs is very important for simulating the budgets of a number of atmospheric trace gases. We further demonstrate that the model tagging scheme has the capability of improving conventional methods of constraining isoprene emissions from space‐borne HCHO column observations, especially in regions where a considerable part of the variability in the HCHO column is not related to isoprene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., & Arellano, A. F. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3423-2006 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Self-citationYoung, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.265 · Cited by 444
Impacts of climate change on surface ozone and intercontinental ozone pollution: A multi‐model study
Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Shindell, D. T., Zeng, G., MacKenzie, I. A., Collins, W. J., Fiore, A. M., Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50266 · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfister, G. G., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J. ‐., Orlando, J. J., Walters, S., Guenther, A., Palmer, P. I., & Lawrence, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-03-08
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- D5
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122837404
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of isoprene to chemical budgets: A model tracer study with the NCAR CTM MOZART‐4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd008948
- The paper
- Pfister, G. G., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J. ‐., Orlando, J. J., Walters, S., Guenther, A., Palmer, P. I., & Lawrence, P. J. (2008). Contribution of isoprene to chemical budgets: A model tracer study with the NCAR CTM MOZART‐4. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.