The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar
Abstract
A method for retrieving precipitation over the ocean using spaceborne W‐band (94 GHz) radar is introduced and applied to the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar. The method is most applicable to stratiform‐type precipitation. Measurements of radar backscatter from the ocean surface are combined with information about surface wind speed and sea surface temperature to derive the path‐integrated attenuation through precipitating cloud systems. The scattering and extinction characteristics of raindrops are modeled using a combination of Mie theory (for raindrops) and the discrete dipole approximation (for ice crystals and melting snow), and a model of the melting layer is implemented to represent the transition between ice and liquid water. Backward Monte Carlo modeling is used to model multiple scattering from precipitating hydrometeors between the radar and ocean surface, which is shown to be significant for precipitation rates exceeding 3–5 mm h −1 , particularly when precipitating ice is present. An uncertainty analysis is presented and the algorithm is applied to near‐global CloudSat observations and compared with other near‐global precipitation sources. In the tropics, CloudSat tends to underestimate the heaviest precipitation. It is found that in the middle latitudes, however, CloudSat observes precipitation more often and with greater resulting accumulation than other spaceborne sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Cited by
Dreary state of precipitation in global models
Stephens, G. L., L'Ecuyer, T., Forbes, R., Gettelmen, A., Golaz, J., Bodas‐Salcedo, A., Suzuki, K., Gabriel, P., & Haynes, J. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2010jd014532 · Cited by 809
Self-citationThe role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget
Matus, A. V., & L'Ecuyer, T. S. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2016jd025951 · Cited by 359
Self-citationA Multisensor Perspective on the Radiative Impacts of Clouds and Aerosols
Henderson, D. S., L’Ecuyer, T., Stephens, G., Partain, P., & Sekiguchi, M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-12-025.1 · Cited by 272
Self-citationAerosols enhance cloud lifetime and brightness along the stratus-to-cumulus transition
Christensen, M. W., Jones, W. K., & Stier, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921231117 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Haynes, J. M., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Stephens, G. L., Miller, S. D., Mitrescu, C., Wood, N. B., & Tanelli, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-02-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- D8
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090735862
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jd009973
- The paper
- Haynes, J. M., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Stephens, G. L., Miller, S. D., Mitrescu, C., Wood, N. B., & Tanelli, S. (2009). Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.