The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method
Open accessAbstract
Recent research documents that the widely accepted generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method for describing forecasting precision and the impact of parameter uncertainty in rainfall/runoff watershed models fails to achieve the intended purpose when used with an informal likelihood measure. In particular, GLUE generally fails to produce intervals that capture the precision of estimated parameters, and the difference between predictions and future observations. This paper illustrates these problems with GLUE using a simple linear rainfall/runoff model so that model calibration is a linear regression problem for which exact expressions for prediction precision and parameter uncertainty are well known and understood. The simple regression example enables us to clearly and simply illustrate GLUE deficiencies. Beven and others have suggested that the choice of the likelihood measure used in a GLUE computation is subjective and may be selected to reflect the goals of the modeler. If an arbitrary likelihood is adopted that does not reasonably reflect the sampling distribution of the model errors, then GLUE generates arbitrary results without statistical validity that should not be used in scientific work. The traditional subjective likelihood measures that have been used with GLUE also fail to reflect the nonnormality, heteroscedasticity, and serial correlation among the residual errors generally found in real problems, and hence are poor metrics for even simple sensitivity analyses and model calibration. Most previous applications of GLUE only produce uncertainty intervals for the average model prediction, which by construction should not be expected to include future observations with the prescribed probability. We show how the GLUE methodology when properly implemented with a statistically valid likelihood function can provide prediction intervals for future observations which will agree with widely accepted and statistically valid analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 24,401
The Advanced Theory of Statistics.
Clarke, G. M., Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344782 · Cited by 6,727
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
A manifesto for the equifinality thesis
Beven, K. J. (2005) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007 · Cited by 2,634
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Sargan, J. D., & Zellner, A. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344559 · Cited by 1,938
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Aigner, D. J., & Zellner, A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284674 · Cited by 1,687
Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer
Beven, K. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119951001 · Cited by 1,640
Dual state–parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter
Moradkhani, H., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., & Houser, P. R. (2004) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002 · Cited by 927
Time series analysis: forecasting and control.
Anderson, O. D. (1980) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(78)90015-7 · Cited by 927
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1016/j.hydrol.2008.02.007 · DOI
- P. J. Bickel K. A. Doksum 2001 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River N. J.
- Carrera J., 2005, The inverse problem in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 13, 206
- Romanowicz R., 1994, Statistics for the Environment II:Water Related Issues, 297
- Romanowicz R., 1996, Floodplain Processes, 333
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 387
Statistical analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall for Nelspruit and its environs
Masereka, E. M., Ochieng, G. M., & Snyman, J. (2018) · Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies · doi:10.4102/jamba.v10i1.499 · Cited by 18
Parameter Estimation and Predictive Uncertainty Quantification in Hydrological Modelling
Kavetski, D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40457-3_25-1 · Cited by 17
A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing
Beven, K. J. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1761 · Cited by 17
Phuong, C. T., Ball, J., & Dao, N. H. (2018) · Water · doi:10.3390/w10111641 · Cited by 17
Suárez-Rey, E. M., Gallardo, M., Romero-Gámez, M., Giménez, C., & Rueda, F. J. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.05.011 · Cited by 17
Blanco, C. J. C., Santos, S., Quintas, M. C., Vinagre, M. V. D. A., & Mesquita, A. L. A. (2013) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.830727 · Cited by 17
Cumulative Effects of Uncertainty on Simulated Streamflow in a Hydrologic Modeling Environment
Pokorny, S., Stadnyk, T., Ali, G. A., Lilhare, R., Déry, S. J., & Koenig, K. A. (2021) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.431 · Cited by 17
Dealing with Uncertainty in Erosion Model Predictions
Beven, K. J., & Brazier, R. E. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444328455.ch4 · Cited by 17
Operational Bayesian GLS Regression for Regional Hydrologic Analyses
Junior, D. S. R., Veilleux, A. G., Lamontagne, J., Stedinger, J. R., & Martins, E. S. P. R. (2020) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2019wr026940 · Cited by 16
Self-citationFlood modelling: parameterisation and inflow uncertainty
Mukolwe, M. M., Baldassarre, G. D., Werner, M., & SOLOMATINE, D. P. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management · doi:10.1680/wama.12.00087 · Cited by 16
Langhans, C., Govers, G., Diels, J., Stone, J. J., & Nearing, M. A. (2014) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.03.005 · Cited by 16
Singh, S., Dash, P., Sankar, M. S., Silwal, S., Lu, Y., Shang, P., & Moorhead, R. J., II (2018) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-018-0473-9 · Cited by 16
Ghoul, I. E., Sellami, H., Khlifi, S., & Vanclooster, M. (2022) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106733 · Cited by 16
Ruffing, C. M., Dwire, K. A., & Daniels, M. D. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3830 · Cited by 16
Rana, S. M. M., Boccelli, D. L., Scott, D., & Hester, E. T. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.003 · Cited by 16
Zhou, Z., Han, N., Liu, J., Yan, Z., Xu, C., Cai, J., Shang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2020) · Journal of Arid Land · doi:10.1007/s40333-020-0061-2 · Cited by 15
Umar, F., Zulkafli, Z., Yusuf, B. B., & Nurhidayu, S. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13030317 · Cited by 15
Wang, C. X., Li, Y., Zhang, J. L., & Huang, G. (2015) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.004 · Cited by 15
Khoshkhoo, Y., Jansson, P. E., Parviz Irannejad, M., Khalili, A., & Rahimi, H. (2015) · Cold Regions Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.07.008 · Cited by 15
Kisekka, I., Migliaccio, K. W., Muñoz‐Carpena, R., Khare, Y. P., & Boyer, T. H. (2013) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/trans.56.10037 · Cited by 15
Guo, J., Zhou, J., Song, L., Zou, Q., & Zeng, X. (2012) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-012-0639-0 · Cited by 15
Asymptotic Behavior of Mass Transfer for Solute Transport Through Stratified Porous Medium
Swami, D., Sharma, P. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Guleria, A., & Sharma, A. (2018) · Transport in Porous Media · doi:10.1007/s11242-018-1090-6 · Cited by 15
Xiang, Y., Li, L., Chen, J., Xu, C., Xia, J., Chen, H., & Liu, J. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11112417 · Cited by 15
Li, G., Wang, Q., Liu, G., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Peng, S., Wei, Y., & Jinnan, W. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12156021 · Cited by 14
Foy, C. R., Arabi, M., Yen, H., Gironás, J., & Bailey, R. T. (2015) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001130 · Cited by 14
Conradt, T., Koch, H., Hattermann, F. F., & Wechsung, F. (2012) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-012-0280-y · Cited by 14
Li, Z., Chen, Q., Xu, Q., & Blanckaert, K. (2013) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2013/701923 · Cited by 14
Delsman, J., de Louw, P. G. B., de Lange, W. J., & Essink, G. O. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.004 · Cited by 14
Knighton, J. O., Menzies, E., Prestigiacomo, A. R., Effler, S. W., & Walter, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.11.003 · Cited by 14
Meng, L., Feng, Q., & Li, Q. (2018) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7794-7 · Cited by 14
Crop Models as Tools for Agroclimatology
Webber, H. A., Hoffmann, M. P., & Rezaei, E. E. (2018) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr60.2016.0025 · Cited by 14
Neglecting Model Parametric Uncertainty Can Drastically Underestimate Flood Risks
Sharma, S., Lee, B. S., Hosseini‐Shakib, I., Haran, M., & Keller, K. M. (2022) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003050 · Cited by 13
Wambura, F. J. (2025) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-025-04138-1 · Cited by 13
Ren, L., Chi, Z., Dong, J. C., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, C. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123069 · Cited by 13
The Role of Prior Probabilities on Parameter Estimation in Hydrological Models
Gupta, A., Govindaraju, R. S., Morbidelli, R., & Corradini, C. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr031291 · Cited by 13
Huang, Y. (2014) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.10.003 · Cited by 13
Bao, Z., Ji, L. J., Zhang, J., Fu, G., Wang, G., Yan, X. L., Zhang, A., Xu, Q., & Shang, M. (2011) · doi:10.5194/hessd-8-7017-2011 · Cited by 13
Scale-dependence of observational and modelling uncertainties in forensic flash flood analysis
Amponsah, W., Marra, F., Zoccatelli, D., Marchi, L., Crema, S., Pirastru, M., & Borga, M. (2022) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127502 · Cited by 12
Hollós, R., Fodor, N., Merganičová, K., Hidy, D., Árendás, T., Grünwald, T., & Barcza, Z. (2022) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105556 · Cited by 12
Mittman, T., Band, L. E., Hwang, T., & Smith, M. L. (2012) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00636.x · Cited by 12
Ensemble Streamflow Forecast: A GLUE‐Based Neural Network Approach1
Asefa, T. (2009) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00351.x · Cited by 12
Shrestha, D. L., Kayastha, N., SOLOMATINE, D. P., & Price, R. K. (2013) · Journal of Hydroinformatics · doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.242 · Cited by 12
A metric for attributing variability in modelled streamflows
Shoaib, S. A., Marshall, L. A., & Sharma, A. (2016) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.050 · Cited by 12
Uncertainty Quantification of Hydrologic Model
Vallam, P., Qin, X., & Yu, J. (2014) · APCBEE Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.10.042 · Cited by 12
Zhou, Y., Guo, S., Xu, C., Chen, H., Guo, J., & Lin, K. (2016) · Hydrology research · doi:10.2166/nh.2016.058 · Cited by 12
Assessing the Impact of Radar-Rainfall Uncertainty on Streamflow Simulation
Velásquez, N., Krajewski, W. F., & Seo, B. C. (2025) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-24-0047.1 · Cited by 11
Sathyamoorthy, S., Vogel, R. M., Chapra, S. C., & Ramsburg, C. A. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.006 · Cited by 11
Self-citationCharacterizing the uncertainty in river stage forecasts conditional on point forecast values
Yan, J., Liao, G., Gebremichael, M., Shedd, R., & Vallee, D. R. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2012wr011818 · Cited by 11
Uncertainty Analyses in Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling: Challenges and Proposed Resolutions
Pathak, C. S., Teegavarapu, R. S. V., Olson, C., Singh, A., Lal, A. M. W., Polatel, C., Zahraeifard, V., & Senarath, S. U. S. (2015) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001231 · Cited by 11
You, X., Li, Z., Edwards, R., & Wang, L. (2015) · Journal of Arid Land · doi:10.1007/s40333-015-0131-z · Cited by 11
A computationally efficient method for uncertainty analysis of SWAT model simulations
Athira, P., Nanda, C., & Sudheer, K. P. (2018) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-018-1538-9 · Cited by 11
Parameter Estimation and Predictive Uncertainty Quantification in Hydrological Modelling
Kavetski, D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39925-1_25 · Cited by 11
Choi, S. Y., Seo, I. W., & Kim, Y.-O. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104558 · Cited by 11
Breinholt, A., Grum, M., Madsen, H., Thordarson, F. Ö., & Mikkelsen, P. S. (2013) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-4159-2013 · Cited by 11
Wheaton, D., & Singha, K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.06.006 · Cited by 11
Risk assessment models and uncertainty estimation of groundwater contamination from point sources
Troldborg, M. (2010) · Cited by 11
Shokri, A., Walker, J. P., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Wright, A., & Pauwels, V. R. N. (2018) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.11464 · Cited by 11
A GLUE uncertainty analysis of a drying model of pharmaceutical granules
Mortier, S. T. F. C., Hoey, S. V., Cierkens, K., Gernaey, K. V., Seuntjens, P., Bernard De Baets, C., Beer, T. D., & Ingmar Nopens, A. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.03.012 · Cited by 10
Athira, P., & Sudheer, K. P. (2014) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0958-4 · Cited by 10
Parameter uncertainty assessment of a flood forecasting model using multiple objectives
Pang, B., Yue, J., Huang, Z., & Zhang, R. (2018) · Journal of Flood Risk Management · doi:10.1111/jfr3.12493 · Cited by 10
Impact of water management policy on flow conditions in wetland areas
Kiczko, A., Romanowicz, R. J., & Osuch, M. (2011) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.004 · Cited by 10
Kovanen, J., Oksanen, J., & Sarjakoski, T. (2018) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2018.06.007 · Cited by 10
Roy, T., & Gupta, H. V. (2020) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104931 · Cited by 10
A modified Jarvis model to improve the expressing of stomatal response in a beech forest
Shao, W., Li, M., Su, Y., Gao, H., & Vlček, L. (2023) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.14955 · Cited by 9
An analytical two-stage risk analysis model in the real-time reservoir operation
Gong, Y., Liu, P., Liu, D., Zhang, X., Xu, W., & Xiang, D. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132256 · Cited by 9
Rivera, D. A., Rivas, Y., & Godoy‐Faúndez, Á. (2015) · Journal of Earth System Science · doi:10.1007/s12040-014-0528-7 · Cited by 9
Statistical Methodology for Evaluating Process-Based Climate Models
Khan, F., & Pilz, J. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.80984 · Cited by 9
Predicting dissolved organic nitrogen export from a drained loblolly pine plantation
Tian, S., Youssef, M. A., Skaggs, R. W., Chescheir, G. M., & Amatya, D. M. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20157 · Cited by 9
Adams, R., Costelloe, J., Western, A. W., & George, B. A. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.009 · Cited by 9
Laine‐Kaulio, H., Koivusalo, H., Komarov, A. S., Lappalainen, M., Launiainen, S., & Laurén, A. (2013) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.026 · Cited by 9
Concentration statistics of solute transport for the near field zone of an estuary
Galešić, M., Andričević, R., Gotovac, H., & Srzić, V. (2016) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.06.009 · Cited by 9
Askarimarnani, S. S., & Willgoose, G. R. (2015) · Procedia Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.04.003 · Cited by 9
LASH MODEL: A HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATION TOOL IN GIS FRAMEWORK
Beskow, S. (2014) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 9
Mishra, A. (2011) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 9
Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations
Balbi, M., & Lallemant, D. (2023) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023 · Cited by 8
Randomized block quasi-Monte Carlo sampling for generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation
Onyutha, C. (2024) · Hydrology research · doi:10.2166/nh.2024.136 · Cited by 8
He, L. F., Huang, G., & Lu, H. W. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000284 · Cited by 8
Current and Future Ecological Status Assessment: A New Holistic Approach for Watershed Management
Fonseca, A., Santos, J. A., Varandas, S. D. G. P., Monteiro, S. M., Martinho, J., Cortes, R., & Cabecinha, E. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12102839 · Cited by 8
Zhang, Y., Xia, J., Shao, Q., Li, L., Yen, H., Zhai, X., Zhao, T., & Lin, K. (2021) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-020-1752-0 · Cited by 8
Quantifying soil hydraulic properties and their uncertainties by modified GLUE method
Yan, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · International Agrophysics · doi:10.1515/intag-2016-0056 · Cited by 8
Chen, C., Peng, C., Hou, H., & Liang, J. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001885 · Cited by 7
Kim, D., Naliaka, A., Zhu, Z., Ogden, F. L., & McMillan, H. (2021) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12953 · Cited by 7
Parameter estimation and uncertainty assessment in hydrological modelling
Blasone, R.-S. (2007) · Cited by 7
Uncertainty estimation in hydrodynamic modeling using Bayesian techniques
Pinheiro, V. B., Naghettini, M., & Palmier, L. R. (2019) · Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos · doi:10.1590/2318-0331.241920180110 · Cited by 7
Practice driven and state-of-the-art methods to quantify hydrologic model uncertainty
Skahill, B. (2013) · US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core) · Cited by 7
Boardman, E. N., Boisramé, G. F. S., Wigmosta, M. S., Shriver, R. K., & Harpold, A. A. (2025) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-29-6333-2025 · Cited by 6
Uncertainty in hydrological modelling: A review
Farzana, S. Z. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrology Research · doi:10.18488/ijhr.v8i1.3297 · Cited by 6
Breaking Uncertainty Barriers: Approximate Bayesian Computation Advances in Rainfall–Runoff Modeling
Andraos, C. (2024) · Water · doi:10.3390/w16233499 · Cited by 6
Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis of ORYZA_V3 Model Using the GLUE Method
Tan, J., & Duan, Q. (2019) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/trans.13419 · Cited by 6
Sage, J., Bonhomme, C., Berthier, E., & Gromaire, M.-C. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001163 · Cited by 6
Menzies, E., Knighton, J. O., Archibald, J. A., & Walter, M. T. (2019) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001774 · Cited by 6
Parallel Hydrological Model Parameter Uncertainty Analysis Based on Message-Passing Interface
Yin, Z., Liao, W., Lei, X., & Wang, H. E. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12102667 · Cited by 6
Galia, T., Tichavský, R., Fabiánová, A., & Spálovský, V. (2021) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2021.105279 · Cited by 6
Extended Residual-State Creep Test and Its Application for Landslide Stability Assessment
Bhat, D. R., Kozubal, J., & Tankiewicz, M. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14081968 · Cited by 6
Chen, S., Qin, W., Cui, T., Qian, J., & Zheng, J. (2024) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104441 · Cited by 5
Quality of flood extents delineated by a non-hydrodynamic GIS tool
Caletka, M., Michalková, M. Š., Martin, K., & Trizna, M. (2019) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.032 · Cited by 5
Zhang, J., Qiao, R., Song, Y., & Lai, Y. (2021) · Water and Environment Journal · doi:10.1111/wej.12748 · Cited by 5
Bayesian calibration and uncertainty quantification for a large nutrient load impact model
Kaurila, K., Lignell, R., Thingstad, T. F., Kuosa, H., & Vanhatalo, J. P. (2024) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102976 · Cited by 5
Environmental Modelling: Learning from Uncertainty
Juston, J. M. (2012) · Cited by 5
Ghavidelfar, S., Shamseldin, A. Y., & Melville, B. W. (2015) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10466 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., & Batchelder, R.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2155633525
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 18.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
- Keywords
- generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation, adhesives, rainfall-runoff modeling, parameter uncertainty, prediction intervals, likelihood function, model calibration, linear regression, forecast uncertainty, heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, uncertainty intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review