Cited by 387Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsGroundwater flow and contamination studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method

Open access

Stedinger, Jery R., Vogel, Richard M., Lee, Seung Uk, Batchelder, Rebecca·2008·Water Resources Research

DOI 10.1029/2008wr006822

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Recent research documents that the widely accepted generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method for describing forecasting precision and the impact of parameter uncertainty in rainfall/runoff watershed models fails to achieve the intended purpose when used with an informal likelihood measure. In particular, GLUE generally fails to produce intervals that capture the precision of estimated parameters, and the difference between predictions and future observations. This paper illustrates these problems with GLUE using a simple linear rainfall/runoff model so that model calibration is a linear regression problem for which exact expressions for prediction precision and parameter uncertainty are well known and understood. The simple regression example enables us to clearly and simply illustrate GLUE deficiencies. Beven and others have suggested that the choice of the likelihood measure used in a GLUE computation is subjective and may be selected to reflect the goals of the modeler. If an arbitrary likelihood is adopted that does not reasonably reflect the sampling distribution of the model errors, then GLUE generates arbitrary results without statistical validity that should not be used in scientific work. The traditional subjective likelihood measures that have been used with GLUE also fail to reflect the nonnormality, heteroscedasticity, and serial correlation among the residual errors generally found in real problems, and hence are poor metrics for even simple sensitivity analyses and model calibration. Most previous applications of GLUE only produce uncertainty intervals for the average model prediction, which by construction should not be expected to include future observations with the prescribed probability. We show how the GLUE methodology when properly implemented with a statistically valid likelihood function can provide prediction intervals for future observations which will agree with widely accepted and statistically valid analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2008wr006822

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 24,401
The Advanced Theory of Statistics.
Clarke, G. M., Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344782 · Cited by 6,727
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
A manifesto for the equifinality thesis
Beven, K. J. (2005) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007 · Cited by 2,634
Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Sargan, J. D., & Zellner, A. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344559 · Cited by 1,938
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Aigner, D. J., & Zellner, A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284674 · Cited by 1,687
Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer
Beven, K. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119951001 · Cited by 1,640
Dual state–parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter
Moradkhani, H., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., & Houser, P. R. (2004) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002 · Cited by 927
Time series analysis: forecasting and control.
Anderson, O. D. (1980) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(78)90015-7 · Cited by 927

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

10.1016/j.hydrol.2008.02.007 · DOI
P. J. Bickel K. A. Doksum 2001 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River N. J.
Carrera J., 2005, The inverse problem in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 13, 206
Romanowicz R., 1994, Statistics for the Environment II:Water Related Issues, 297
Romanowicz R., 1996, Floodplain Processes, 333

Sorted by citations

Items 301–387 of 387

Uncertainty Analysis and Calibration of SWMM Using a Formal Bayesian Methodology
Muleta, M. K. (2012) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/9780784412312.060 · Cited by 5
Optimized Gross Primary Productivity Over the Croplands Within the BEPS Particle Filtering Data Assimilation System (BEPS_PF v1.0)
Xing, X., Wu, M., Zhu, H., Duan, W., Ju, W., Wang, X., Ran, Y., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, F. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2024ms004412 · Cited by 4
A Formal, Bayesian Approach for Uncertainty Analysis of a Watershed Model
Muleta, M. K. (2012) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/9780784412312.375 · Cited by 4
Uncertainty analysis of the HORTSYST model applied to fertigated tomatoes cultivated in a hydroponic greenhouse system
Ruíz, A. M., López-Cruz, I. L., Ruíz‐García, A., Pineda-Pineda, J., Sánchez‐García, P., & Mendóza-Pérez, C. (2021) · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5424/sjar/2021193-17842 · Cited by 4
The GLUE Methodology for Model Calibration with Uncertainty
Beven, K. J. (2014) · IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks · doi:10.1142/9781848162716_0006 · Cited by 4
Choosing various likelihood functions on uncertainty assessment in groundwater simulation-optimization model
Khatiri, K. N., Niksokhan, M. H., & Sarang, A. (2020) · Water Science & Technology Water Supply · doi:10.2166/ws.2020.003 · Cited by 4
Model Uncertainty Analysis and the Margin of Safety
Hantush, M. M., Zhang, H. X., Camacho, R. A., Ahmadisharaf, E., & Mohamoud, Y. M. (2022) · American Society of Civil Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1061/9780784415948.ch9 · Cited by 4
Quantifying the parameter uncertainty in the cross-sectional dimensions for a stream restoration design of a gravel-bed stream
Resop, J. P., Hession, W. C., & Wynn‐Thompson, T. (2014) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.69.4.306 · Cited by 4
Modelling and sensitivity analysis of urinary platinum excretion in anticancer chemotherapy for the recovery of platinum
Folens, K., Mortier, S. T. F. C., Baeten, J. E., Couvreur, K., Michelet, R., Gernaey, K. V., Beer, T. D., Laing, G. D., & Ingmar Nopens, A. (2016) · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.scp.2016.10.001 · Cited by 4
Improved Inverse Modeling by Separating Model Structural and Observational Errors
Cheng, Q., Chen, X., Cheng, D.-D., Wu, Y., & Xie, Y. (2018) · Water · doi:10.3390/w10091151 · Cited by 4
Risk-based probabilistic fluvial flood forecasting for integrated catchment models - Phase 1 Report
Sene, K., Weerts, A., Beven, K. J., Moore, R. E., Whitlow, C., & Young, P. C. (2009) · NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · Cited by 4
Monitoring and Modelling Hydrological Processes
Dadson, S., Hirpa, F. A., Thomson, P., & Konar, M. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119520627.ch7 · Cited by 4
Advancing parameter uncertainty quantification in hydrology models through integration of variational inference with a differentiable hydrology framework
Nguyen, G. V., Van, C. P., Van, L. N., Tran, V. N., Kim, Y., & Lee, G. (2025) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-025-02954-w · Cited by 3
A surrogate-aided approach for accelerated Bayesian calibration of hydrologic models
Arabzadeh, R., Romero-Cuéllar, J., Craig, J., Tolson, B. A., & Chlumsky, R. (2026) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.106894 · Cited by 3
Optimized Predictive Coverage by Averaging Time‐Windowed Bayesian Distributions
Hsueh, H., Guthke, A., Wöhling, T., & Nowak, W. (2024) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2022wr033280 · Cited by 3
Flood forecasting and error simulation using copula entropy method
Chen, L., & Singh, V. P. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820673-7.00011-1 · Cited by 3
Developing a System Dynamics Model for Phosphorous TMDL in Reservoir: A Case Study
Karamouz, M., & Taheriyoun, M. (2010) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/41114(371)158 · Cited by 3
An Interactive Multi-Objective Framework for Groundwater Inverse Modeling
Singh, A. (2007) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 3
Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of the Modified Wind Erosion Equation for Application in Canada
Huang, Q., Badreldin, N., Lobb, D. A., Li, S., Feng, G. G., & McConkey, B. G. (2017) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2760 · Cited by 3
Conceptual Model Uncertainty in the Management of the Chi River Basin, Thailand
Nettasana, T. (2012) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 3
Integrated sensitivity analysis, calibration, and uncertainty propagation analysis approaches for supporting hydrological modeling
Wu, H. (2016) · Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · Cited by 3
Uncertainty in prediction and simulation of flow in sewer systems
Breinholt, A. (2012) · Cited by 3
Hydrological water quality modelling of nested meso scale catchments
Jiang, S. (2014) · doi:10.24355/dbbs.084-201406131110-0 · Cited by 3
A novel statistical framework for the reduction of uncertainties in multimodel ensemble of global climate models of precipitation simulations
Khalil, R., & Ali, Z. (2025) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-025-07867-6 · Cited by 2
Unveiling soil coherence patterns along Etihad Rail using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data and machine learning in arid region
Younis, S. M. A., Momani, D. E. A., Gafoor, F. A., AlAnsari, Z., Hashemi, H. A., & Al-Shehhi, M. R. (2024) · Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101374 · Cited by 2
A multi-hydrological model ensemble prediction uncertainty estimation (e-PRUNE) framework
Onyutha, C. (2025) · Hydrology research · doi:10.2166/nh.2025.116 · Cited by 2
Selecting fitted models under epistemic uncertainty using a stochastic process on quantile functions
René, A., & Longtin, A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64658-7 · Cited by 2
Impact of digital terrain model uncertainty on flood inundation mapping
Sojka, M., & Wróżyński, R. (2013) · Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska · Cited by 2
CQUESST: A dynamical stochastic framework for predicting soil-carbon sequestration
Pagendam, D., Baldock, J., Clifford, D. J., Farquharson, R., Murray, L. M., Beare, M., & Cressie, N. (2025) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/25-aoas2057 · Cited by 2
Assessing Validity of the Dead Zone Model to Characterize Transport of Contaminants in the River Wkra
Mrokowska, M. M., & Osuch, M. (2011) · GeoPlanet: earth and planetary sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17475-9_16 · Cited by 2
An Improved Bayesian Structural Identification Using the First Two Derivatives of Log-Likelihood Measure
Zhou, J., Mita, A., & Liu, M. (2015) · Journal of Structures · doi:10.1155/2015/236475 · Cited by 2
A Blueprint for Process-Based Modeling of
Montanari, A., & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2012) · Cited by 2
Uncertainty Assessment
Brazier, R. E., Krueger, T., & Wainwright, J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5727-1_10 · Cited by 2
References
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119951001.refs · Cited by 2
Bayesian Inference for the Urban Drainage Models Uncertainty Quantification Based on Heteroscedastic Residual Assumption
Yu, T., Wei, S., Long, Z., Zhang, T., & Chu, S. (2025) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-025-04176-9 · Cited by 1
A climate-adapted GIS-based simulation-optimization method for optimal basin-scale wetland placement to mitigate nonpoint source pollution under shared socioeconomic pathways
Dai, C., Zhu, H., Zhang, X., & Cheng, G. (2026) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135109 · Cited by 1
Quantification of Different Uncertainties in Streamflow Simulations and Their Propagation Across Multiple Catchments
Akhter, M., Nayak, M. A., & Ahanger, M. A. (2026) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.70439 · Cited by 1
Assessing the Impact of the Urban Tree Canopy on Streamflow Response: An Extension of Physically Based Hydrologic Modeling to the Suburban Landscape
Mittman, T. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/d129-2z75 · Cited by 1
Unscented importance sampling for parameter calibration of carbon sequestration systems
Sarkarfarshi, M., & Gracie, R. (2014) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0963-7 · Cited by 1
Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Simulation of Watershed Nutrient Load: A Case Study
Karamouz, ‪., Taheriyoun, M., Seyedabadi, M., & Behboodian, S. (2009) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/41036(342)650 · Cited by 1
Uncertainty propagation throughout an integrated water-quality model
Freni, G., Mannina, G., & Viviani, G. (2010) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 1
Global and Low-Cost Topographic Data to Support Flood Studies
Yan, K., Neal, J. C., SOLOMATINE, D. P., & Baldassarre, G. D. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394846-5.00004-7 · Cited by 1
Dynamics of dissolved carbon and nitrogen in decomposing boreal mor and peat as affected by enchytraeid worms
Lappalainen, M. (2018) · Dissertationes Forestales · doi:10.14214/df.262 · Cited by 1
Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Models with Calibrated Parameters
Lee, S. U., & Stedinger, J. R. (2009) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/41036(342)521 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Measurement and modeling of stormwater from small suburban watersheds in Vermont
Nipper, J. (2016) · ScholarWorks -A service of University of Vermont Libraries (University of Vermont) · Cited by 1
Probabilistic Assessment of Extended Detention Basins: Role of Model Parameter Uncertainty
Olson, C., Arabi, M., Dell, T. A., & Roesner, L. A. (2020) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001226 · Cited by 1
Approaches for sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of dynamic mathematical models of greenhouse climate: an overview
López-Cruz, I. L., Fitz-Rodríguez, E., Salazar, R., & Rojano-Aguilar, A. (2020) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2020.1296.15 · Cited by 1
Modelling for Flood Risk Management
Hall, J. W. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119951445.ch8 · Cited by 1
Characterization of Groundwater with Complementary Age Tracers
Beyer, M. (2015) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17018660 · Cited by 1
Uncertainty in flood risk and its implications for management
Parkes, B. L. (2015) · Research Portal (King's College London) · Cited by 1
Variability of soil hydraulic properties and its impact on agro-hydrological model predictions
Oliveira, T. C. (2019) · doi:10.11606/t.64.2019.tde-08102019-172326 · Cited by 1
UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR WATERSHED MODELS WITH CALIBRATED PARAMETERS
Lee, S. (2010) · eCommons (Cornell University)
Self-citation
Developments in Informal Multi-Criteria Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation in Hydrological Modelling
Hassanabadi, M. S. (2014) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Practical Applications of Risk and Uncertainty Theory in Water Resources: Shortcuts Taken and Their Possible Effects
Williams, D. T., & Stedinger, J. R. (2011) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress (EWRI) · doi:10.1061/41173(414)388
Self-citation
Uncertainty Analysis of Hydrodynamic Modeling of Flooding in the Lower Niger River Under Sea Level Rise Conditions
Musa, Z. N., Popescu, I., & Mynett, A. E. (2015) · Springer water · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-615-7_13
Avaliação de incertezas na calibração automática do modelo SWMM
Shinma, T. A. (2016) · doi:10.11606/t.18.2016.tde-10052016-104935
Measures of model performance, uncertainty and stochastic modelling
Rodda, H. J. E., & Little, M. A. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119077985.ch6
Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of episodic ozone predictions from the community multiscale air quality model
Beddows, A. V. (2016) · Research Portal (King's College London)
Az éghajlatváltozás lehetséges hatásai a mezőgazdasági szénmérlegre és produktivitásra Magyarországon
Dobor, L. (2016) · Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem · doi:10.15476/elte.2016.055
A Data-driven Diagnostic Framework for Small Watersheds based on Markov Chain-Monte CarloPreprint
Peng, X. J., & Albertson, J. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
The application of approximate bayesian computation in the calibration of hydrological models
Brown, J. J. (2014) · Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University)
Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
Juston, J. M. (2010)
Comment on hess-2021-514
(2021) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-2021-514-rc1
Comment on hess-2021-514
(2021) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-2021-514-rc2
Reply on RC2
Liu, Y. (2022) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-2021-514-ac2
Reply on RC1
Liu, Y. (2022) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-2021-514-ac1
Bibliography
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118459423.biblio
Bibliography
(2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119532033.biblio
EFFECTIVENESS OF ROADSIDE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) ON MAINTAINING STORMWATER QUALITY THROUGH MONITORING AND MODELING
Jahan, K. (2021) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-jahan-khurshid-2021
Comment on egusphere-2022-760
(2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-760-rc1
Comment on egusphere-2022-760
(2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-760-rc2
Reply on RC1
Balbi, M. (2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-760-ac2
Reply on RC1
Balbi, M. (2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-760-ac1
Reply on RC2
Balbi, M. (2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-760-ac3
Global and low-cost topographic data to support flood studies
Yan, K., Neal, J. C., SOLOMATINE, D. P., & Baldassarre, G. D. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819101-9.00010-8
Performance of Loss Models for Predicting Flood Hydrographs in a Semiarid Watershed with Limited Observations Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Hydrologic Models
Esmaeili, H., Shojaei, P., & Ahmadisharaf, E. (2024) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-6155
Reactive transport as a scientific framework
Maher, K., & Perzan, Z. (2024) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99762-1.00071-1
Reply on RC2
Boardman, E. N. (2025) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-1877-ac2
Reply on RC1
Boardman, E. N. (2025) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-1877-ac1
Comparison of GLUE Weighting Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Hydrologic Modeling
Fathabadi, A., Seyedian, S. M., & Choubin, B. (2025) · Natural Resource Modeling · doi:10.1111/nrm.70008
Residual error modelling for process-based flood frequency analysis
Romero-Cuéllar, J., Craig, J. R., Tolson, B. A., & Arabzadeh, R. (2026) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-26-5389-2026
Prévision d'ensemble des crues rapides méditerranéennes
Édouard, S. (2016) · doi:10.70675/27766159z05e6z4728zbf95ze2089f69bfef
Stochastic modelling of flood phenomena based on the combination of mechanist and systemic approaches
Boutkhamouine, B. (2018) · doi:10.70675/74eb7a61zcccdz4fabz9544z7607f0d1b4dd
Calibration of a climate suitability model using a generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE): a global case study of orange production
Hyun, S., Kim, K. S., & Beresford, R. M. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44664-5
Climate change impacts on alpine springs in Austria: shifts in discharge seasonality and water availability
Masten, M., Seelig, M., Seelig, S., Vremec, M., Wagner, T., Obwegs, M., Hausleber, M., Eybl, J., & Winkler, G. (2026) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136337
Strategic Deep‐Water Observations Enhance Probabilistic Parameter Estimation of Lake Hydrodynamic Models
Onen, M. O., Ladwig, R., Douterelo, I., Darch, G. J. C., & Rougé, C. (2026) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2025wr042103
Searching Historic Data For Model Identification
Viksmo-Slettan, E. (2012)

Authors: Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., & Batchelder, R.
Affiliations: Cornell University (US)
Tufts University (US)
ORCID: Stedinger, Jery R.
Vogel, Richard M.
Venue: Water Resources Research
Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Published: 2008-11
Volume: 44
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
1944-7973
DOI: 10.1029/2008wr006822
OpenAlex: W2155633525
Cited by: 386
References: 69
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
FWCI: 18.29
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords: generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation, adhesives, rainfall-runoff modeling, parameter uncertainty, prediction intervals, likelihood function, model calibration, linear regression, forecast uncertainty, heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, uncertainty intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks