The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during the 20th century
Open accessAbstract
Annual peak discharge records from 50 stations in the continental United States with at least 100 years of record are used to investigate stationarity of flood peaks during the 20th century. We examine temporal trends in flood peaks and abrupt changes in the mean and/or variance of flood peak distributions. Change point analysis for detecting abrupt changes in flood distributions is performed using the nonparametric Pettitt test. Two nonparametric (Mann‐Kendall and Spearman) tests and one parametric (Pearson) test are used to detect the presence of temporal trends. Generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) are also used to parametrically model the annual peak data, exploiting their flexibility to account for abrupt changes and temporal trends in the parameters of the distribution functions. Additionally, the presence of long‐term persistence is investigated through estimation of the Hurst exponent, and an alternative interpretation of the results in terms of long‐term persistence is provided. Many of the drainage basins represented in this study have been affected by regulation through systems of reservoirs, and all of the drainage basins have experienced significant land use changes during the 20th century. Despite the profound changes that have occurred to drainage basins throughout the continental United States and the recognition that elements of the hydrologic cycle are being altered by human‐induced climate change, it is easier to proclaim the demise of stationarity of flood peaks than to prove it through analyses of annual flood peak data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Hydrology for urban land planning - A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use
Leopold, L. B. (1968) · Circular · doi:10.3133/cir554 · Cited by 872
Cited by
Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Brooks, H., Kossin, J., Lawrimore, J. H., Arndt, D., Bosart, L., Changnon, D., Cutter, S. L., Doesken, N., et al. (2013) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00262.1 · Cited by 536
Khazaei, B., Khatami, S., Alemohammad, S. H., Rashidi, L., Wu, C., Madani, K., Kalantari, Z., Destouni, G., & Aghakouchak, A. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.004 · Cited by 245
Rice, J. S., Emanuel, R. E., Vose, J. M., & Nelson, S. A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016367 · Cited by 95
A practice-oriented framework for stationary and nonstationary flood frequency analysis
Vidrio-Sahagún, C. T., Ruschkowski, J., He, J., & Pietroniro, A. (2024) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105940 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Villarini, G., Serinaldi, F., Smith, J. A., & Krajewski, W. F.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1545154642
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during the 20th century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008wr007645
- The paper
- Villarini, G., Serinaldi, F., Smith, J. A., & Krajewski, W. F. (2009). On the stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during the 20th century. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.