The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common depth of slab‐mantle decoupling: Reconciling diversity and uniformity of subduction zones
Open accessAbstract
Processes in subduction zones such as slab and mantle‐wedge metamorphism, intraslab earthquakes, and arc volcanism vary systematically with the age‐dependent thermal state of the subducting slab. In contrast, the configuration of subduction zones is rather uniform in that the arc is typically situated where the slab is ∼100 km deep. Toward reconciling the diversity and uniformity, we developed numerical thermal models with a nonlinear mantle rheology for seventeen subduction zones, spanning a large range of slab age, descent rate, and geometry. Where there are adequate observations, such as in Cascadia, northeast Japan, and Kamchatka, we find that surface heat flows can be explained if the interface between the slab and the mantle wedge is decoupled to a depth of 70–80 km. Models with this common decoupling depth predict that the region of high mantle temperatures and optimal fluid supply from the dehydrating slab, both required for melt generation for arc volcanism, occurs where the slab is ∼100 km deep. These models also reproduce the variations of the metamorphic, seismic, and volcanic processes with the thermal state of the slab. The shallow decoupling results in a stagnant fore arc whose thermal regime is controlled mainly by the subducting slab. The deeper coupling leads to a sudden onset of mantle wedge flow that brings heat from greater depths and the back arc, and its thermal effect overshadows that of the slab in the arc region. Our results serve to recast the research of subduction zone geodynamics into a quest for understanding what controls the common depth of decoupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., & Stein, S. (1990) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1990.tb06579.x · Cited by 3,760
Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic
Cande, S. C., & Kent, D. V. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/94jb03098 · Cited by 3,730
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., & Stein, S. (1994) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/94gl02118 · Cited by 3,462
Engdahl, E. R., van der Hilst, R., & Buland, R. (1998) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/bssa0880030722 · Cited by 2,053
Experimentally based water budgets for dehydrating slabs and consequences for arc magma generation
Schmidt, M. W., & Poli, S. (1998) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(98)00142-3 · Cited by 1,935
Rheology of the Upper Mantle: A Synthesis
Karato, S.-I., & Wu, P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.260.5109.771 · Cited by 1,784
Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program
Binns, R. A., Barriga, F., Miller, J. M., Asada, R., Bach, W., Bartetzko, A., Benning, L. G., Bjerkgård, T., Christiansen, L. B., Findlay, B., et al. (2002) · Cited by 1,596
Heat flow from the Earth's interior: Analysis of the global data set
Pollack, H. N., Hurter, S. J., & Johnson, J. R. (1993) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/93rg01249 · Cited by 1,593
A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age
Stein, C. A., & Stein, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359123a0 · Cited by 1,515
Speculations on the Consequences and Causes of Plate Motions
McKenzie, D. P. (1969) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1969.tb00259.x · Cited by 1,151
Cited by
The global range of subduction zone thermal models
Syracuse, E. M., van Keken, P. E., & Abers, G. A. (2010) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2010.02.004 · Cited by 1,540
Subduction factory: 4. Depth-dependent flux of H 2 O from subducting slabs worldwide
van Keken, P. E., Hacker, B. R., Syracuse, E. M., & Abers, G. A. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2010jb007922 · Cited by 949
Reevaluating carbon fluxes in subduction zones, what goes down, mostly comes up
Kelemen, P. B., & Manning, C. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507889112 · Cited by 720
The Role of H2O in Subduction Zone Magmatism
Grove, T. L., Till, C. B., & Krawczynski, M. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105310 · Cited by 592
Penniston-Dorland, S. C., Kohn, M. J., & Manning, C. E. (2015) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.031 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Wada, I., & Wang, K.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1532952932
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common depth of slab‐mantle decoupling: Reconciling diversity and uniformity of subduction zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009gc002570
- The paper
- Wada, I., & Wang, K. (2009). Common depth of slab‐mantle decoupling: Reconciling diversity and uniformity of subduction zones. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gc002570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.