The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination
Open accessAbstract
We relocate nearly 100,000 events that occurred during the period 1964 to 1995 and are well-constrained teleseismically by arrival-time data reported to the International Seismological Centre (ISC) and to the U.S. Geological Survey's National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC). Hypocenter determination is significantly improved by using, in addition to regional and teleseismic P and S phases, the arrival times of PKiKP, PKPdf, and the teleseismic depth phases pP, pwP, and sP in the relocation procedure. A global probability model developed for later-arriving phases is used to independently identify the depth phases. The relocations are compared to hypocenters reported in the ISC and NEIC catalogs and by other sources. Differences in our epicenters with respect to ISC and NEIC estimates are generally small and regionally systematic due to the combined effects of the observing station network and plate geometry regionally, differences in upper mantle travel times between the reference earth models used, and the use of later-arriving phases. Focal depths are improved substantially over most other independent estimates, demonstrating (for example) how regional structures such as downgoing slabs can severely bias depth estimation when only regional and teleseismic P arrivals are used to determine the hypocenter. The new data base, which is complete to about Mw 5.2 and includes all events for which moment-tensor solutions are available, has immediate application to high-resolution definition of Wadati-Benioff Zones (WBZs) worldwide, regional and global tomographic imaging, and other studies of earth structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The global range of subduction zone thermal models
Syracuse, E. M., van Keken, P. E., & Abers, G. A. (2010) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2010.02.004 · Cited by 1,540
Geodynamics of flat subduction: Seismicity and tomographic constraints from the Andean margin
Gutscher, M., Spakman, W., Bijwaard, H., & Engdahl, E. R. (2000) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/1999tc001152 · Cited by 722
Self-citationSubducted slabs stagnant above, penetrating through, and trapped below the 660 km discontinuity
Fukao, Y., & Obayashi, M. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2013jb010466 · Cited by 579
Oncken, O., Hindle, D., Kley, J., Elger, K., Victor, P., & Schemmann, K. (2006) · Frontiers in Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48684-8_1 · Cited by 349
Simmons, N. A., Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., & Matzel, E. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2012jb009525 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Engdahl, E. R., van der Hilst, R., & Buland, R.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 722-743
- ISSN
- 0037-1106 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3573
- OpenAlex
- W1913469372
- Cited by
- 2,053
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 74.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1785/bssa0880030722
- The paper
- Engdahl, E. R., van der Hilst, R., & Buland, R. (1998). Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0880030722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.