Cited by 91Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesCalibration and Measurement TechniquesClimate variability and models

Retrieval characteristics of non‐linear sea surface temperature from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer

Open access
Merchant, C. J., Harris, A. R., Roquet, H., Le Borgne, P.·2009·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Criteria are proposed for evaluating sea surface temperature (SST) retrieved from satellite infra‐red imagery: bias should be small on regional scales; sensitivity to atmospheric humidity should be small; and sensitivity of retrieved SST to surface temperature should be close to 1 K K−1. Their application is illustrated for non‐linear sea surface temperature (NLSST) estimates. 233929 observations from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on Metop‐A are matched with in situ data and numerical weather prediction (NWP) fields. NLSST coefficients derived from these matches have regional biases from −0.5 to +0.3 K. Using radiative transfer modelling we find that a 10% increase in humidity alone can change the retrieved NLSST by between −0.5 K and +0.1 K. A 1 K increase in SST changes NLSST by <0.5 K in extreme cases. The validity of estimates of sensitivity by radiative transfer modelling is confirmed empirically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2009gl039843

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-view coefficient-based retrievals are associated with geographical biases arising from this information content deficit.

    “Particularly for day-lit scenes, where only the 11 and 12 µm channels are used, single-view coefficient-based retrievals are associated with geographical biases arising from this information content deficit38.”
  • AVHRRs are single-view sensors, which reduces the information content available for determining SST compared to the dual-view ATSRs.

    “Unlike the ATSR-series, the AVHRRs are single-view sensors, which reduces the information content available for determining SST compared to the dual-view ATSRs.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 91

Authors
Merchant, C. J., Harris, A. R., Roquet, H., & Le Borgne, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Météo-France (FR)
  • Centre de Météorologie Spatiale Météo‐France Lannion France
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2009-09
Volume
36
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2033779577
Cited by
91
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (earth010002)
  • National Centre for Earth Observation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
AVHRR, retrieval bias, radiative transfer modelling, MetOp-A, numerical weather prediction, SST estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review