The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles
Open accessAbstract
A cloud frequency of occurrence matrix is generated using merged cloud vertical profiles derived from the satellite‐borne Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) and cloud profiling radar. The matrix contains vertical profiles of cloud occurrence frequency as a function of the uppermost cloud top. It is shown that the cloud fraction and uppermost cloud top vertical profiles can be related by a cloud overlap matrix when the correlation length of cloud occurrence, which is interpreted as an effective cloud thickness, is introduced. The underlying assumption in establishing the above relation is that cloud overlap approaches random overlap with increasing distance separating cloud layers and that the probability of deviating from random overlap decreases exponentially with distance. One month of Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and CloudSat data (July 2006) support these assumptions, although the correlation length sometimes increases with separation distance when the cloud top height is large. The data also show that the correlation length depends on cloud top hight and the maximum occurs when the cloud top height is 8 to 10 km. The cloud correlation length is equivalent to the decorrelation distance introduced by Hogan and Illingworth (2000) when cloud fractions of both layers in a two‐cloud layer system are the same. The simple relationships derived in this study can be used to estimate the top‐of‐atmosphere irradiance difference caused by cloud fraction, uppermost cloud top, and cloud thickness vertical profile differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kato, S., Loeb, N. G., Rose, F. G., Doelling, D. R., Rutan, D. A., Caldwell, T. E., Yu, L., & Weller, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-12-00436.1 · Cited by 437
Self-citationThe role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget
Matus, A. V., & L'Ecuyer, T. S. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2016jd025951 · Cited by 359
Taylor, P. C., Kato, S., Xu, K., & Cai, M. (2015) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2015jd023520 · Cited by 111
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kato, S., Sun‐Mack, S., Miller, W. F., Rose, F. G., Chen, Y., Minnis, P., & Wielicki, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-02-27
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- D4
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979502228
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jd012277
- The paper
- Kato, S., Sun‐Mack, S., Miller, W. F., Rose, F. G., Chen, Y., Minnis, P., & Wielicki, B. A. (2010). Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.