The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of the Worldwide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) using the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) as ground truth
Open accessAbstract
A performance assessment of the Worldwide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) is presented using the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) as ground truth, over unprecedented time and spatial scales. The study spans 3 years, from 5 April 2006 to 31 March 2009, throughout the contiguous United States. The capabilities of the network are shown to improve greatly from the first to the third year of the study, with an overall detection efficiency of cloud‐to‐ground flashes increasing from 3.88% in 2006−2007 to 10.30% in 2008−2009. The WWLLN cloud‐to‐ground detection efficiency is found to be strongly dependent on peak current and polarity, attaining values larger than 10% (35%) for currents stronger than ±35 kA (−130 kA) and values less than 2% for currents between 0 and −10 kA. The location accuracy is found to have a northward and westward bias, with average location errors of 4.03 km in the north‐south and 4.98 km in the east‐west directions, respectively. The WWLLN is shown to have strong limitations in capturing the diurnal cycle, missing both the timing of the maximum and minimum lightning activity (around 1600 and 0900 LT, respectively), and the amplitude of the cycle as well. It is found that in 3 h intervals, the number of flashes in the WWLLN has some proportionality to the number of flashes in the NLDN, suggesting that the WWLLN has strong potential for meteorological applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Combined TOA/MDF Technology Upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network
Cummins, K. L., Murphy, M. J., Bardo, E. A., Hiscox, W. L., Pyle, R. B., & Pifer, A. E. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd00153 · Cited by 1,067
WHERE ARE THE MOST INTENSE THUNDERSTORMS ON EARTH?
Zipser, E. J., Cecil, D. J., Liu, C., Nesbitt, S. W., & Yorty, D. P. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-87-8-1057 · Cited by 991
Cummins, K. L., & Murphy, M. J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · doi:10.1109/temc.2009.2023450 · Cited by 688
The Diurnal Cycle of Rainfall and Convective Intensity according to Three Years of TRMM Measurements
Nesbitt, S. W., & Zipser, E. J. (2003) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442-16.10.1456 · Cited by 668
Inferences of Predictability Associated with Warm Season Precipitation Episodes
Carbone, R. E., Tuttle, J. D., Ahijevych, D. A., & Trier, S. B. (2002) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2033:iopaww>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 477
Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in the United States: NLDN Results in the First Decade, 1989–98
Orville, R. E., & Huffines, G. R. (2001) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1179:ctglit>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 314
Detection efficiency of the VLF World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN): initial case study
Rodger, C. J., Werner, S., Brundell, J. B., Lay, E. H., Thomson, N. R., Holzworth, R. H., & Dowden, R. L. (2006) · Annales Geophysicae · doi:10.5194/angeo-24-3197-2006 · Cited by 306
Rainfall Occurrence in the U.S. Warm Season: The Diurnal Cycle*
Carbone, R. E., & Tuttle, J. D. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2008jcli2275.1 · Cited by 246
Biagi, C. J., Cummins, K. L., Kehoe, K. E., & Krider, E. P. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007341 · Cited by 241
Fleenor, S. A., Biagi, C. J., Cummins, K. L., Krider, E. P., & Shao, X. (2008) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.08.011 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332
Metadata
- Authors
- Abarca, S. F., Corbosiero, K. L., & Galarneau, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-09-22
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- D18
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075393126
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of the Worldwide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) using the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) as ground truth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jd013411
- The paper
- Abarca, S. F., Corbosiero, K. L., & Galarneau, T. J. (2010). An evaluation of the Worldwide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) using the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) as ground truth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.