The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection efficiency of the VLF World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN): initial case study
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. An experimental Very Low Frequency (VLF) World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) has been developed through collaborations with research institutions across the world, providing global real-time locations of lightning discharges. As of April 2006, the network included 25 stations providing coverage for much of the Earth. In this paper we examine the detection efficiency of the WWLLN by comparing the locations from this network with lightning location data purchased from a commercial lightning location network operating in New Zealand. Our analysis confirms that WWLLN favours high peak current return stroke lightning discharges, and that discharges with larger currents are observed by more stations across the global network. We then construct a first principles detection efficiency model to describe the WWLLN, combining calibration information for each station with theoretical modelling to describe the expected amplitudes of the VLF sferics observed by the network. This detection efficiency model allows the prediction of the global variation in WWLLN lightning detection, and an estimate of the minimum CG return stroke peak current required to trigger the network. There are strong spatial variations across the globe, primarily due to station density and sensitivity. The WWLLN is currently best suited to study the occurrence and impacts of high peak-current lightning. For example, in 2005 about 12% of the global elve-producing lightning will have been located by the network. Since the lightning-EMP which produce elves has a high mean rate (210 per minute) it has the potential to significantly influence the ionosphere on regional scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Christian, H. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Boccippio, D. J., Boeck, W. L., Buechler, D. E., Driscoll, K. T., Goodman, S. J., Hall, J. M., Koshak, W. J., Mach, D. M., et al. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002347 · Cited by 1,438
The Schumann Resonance: A Global Tropical Thermometer
Williams, E. R. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5060.1184 · Cited by 484
Red sprites, upward lightning, and VLF perturbations
Rodger, C. J. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900006 · Cited by 172
Self-citationThe global distribution of lightning NOx simulated on-line in a general circulation model
Jourdain, L., & Hauglustaine, D. A. (2001) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part C Solar Terrestrial & Planetary Science · doi:10.1016/s1464-1917(01)00051-4 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332
Abarca, S. F., Corbosiero, K. L., & Galarneau, T. J. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd013411 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodger, C. J., Werner, S., Brundell, J. B., Lay, E. H., Thomson, N. R., Holzworth, R. H., & Dowden, R. L.
- Venue
- Annales Geophysicae
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2006-12-21
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3197-3214
- ISSN
- 0992-7689 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0576
- OpenAlex
- W2012035555
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection efficiency of the VLF World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN): initial case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/angeo-24-3197-2006
- The paper
- Rodger, C. J., Werner, S., Brundell, J. B., Lay, E. H., Thomson, N. R., Holzworth, R. H., & Dowden, R. L. (2006). Detection efficiency of the VLF World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN): initial case study. Annales Geophysicae. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3197-2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.