Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrologic evaluation of Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China

Yong, Bin, Ren, Li‐Liang, Hong, Yang, Wang, Jia‐Hu, Gourley, Jonathan J., Jiang, Shan‐Hu, Chen, Xi, Wang, Wen·2010·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Two standard Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products, 3B42RT and 3B42V6, were quantitatively evaluated in the Laohahe basin, China, located within the TMPA product latitude band (50°NS) but beyond the inclined TRMM satellite latitude band (36°NS). In general, direct comparison of TMPA rainfall estimates to collocated rain gauges from 2000 to 2005 show that the spatial and temporal rainfall characteristics over the region are well captured by the 3B42V6 estimates. Except for a few months with underestimation, the 3B42RT estimates show unrealistic overestimation nearly year round, which needs to be resolved in future upgrades to the real‐time estimation algorithm. Both model‐parameter error analysis and hydrologic application suggest that the three‐layer Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC‐3L) model cannot tolerate the nonphysical overestimation behavior of 3B42RT through the hydrologic integration processes, and as such the 3B42RT data have almost no hydrologic utility, even at the monthly scale. In contrast, the 3B42V6 data can produce much better hydrologic predictions with reduced error propagation from input to streamflow at both the daily and monthly scales. This study also found the error structures of both RT and V6 have a significant geo‐topography‐dependent distribution pattern, closely associated with latitude and elevation bands, suggesting current limitations with TRMM‐era algorithms at high latitudes and high elevations in general. Looking into the future Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) era, the Geostationary Infrared (GEO‐IR) estimates still have a long‐term role in filling the inevitable gaps in microwave coverage, as well as in enabling sub‐hourly estimates at typical 4‐km grid scales. Thus, this study affirms the call for a real‐time systematic bias removal in future upgrades to the IR‐based RT algorithm using a simple scaling factor. This correction is based on MW‐based monthly rainfall climatologies applied to the combined monthly satellite‐gauge research products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2009wr008965

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Yong, B., Ren, L., Hong, Y., Wang, J., Gourley, J. J., Jiang, S., Chen, X., & Wang, W.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2010-07
Volume
46
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1608957158
Cited by
294
References
2
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrologic evaluation of Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009wr008965
The paper
Yong, B., Ren, L., Hong, Y., Wang, J., Gourley, J. J., Jiang, S., Chen, X., & Wang, W. (2010). Hydrologic evaluation of Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008965

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.