The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineering cyber infrastructure for U-Pb geochronology: Tripoli and U-Pb_Redux: TRIPOLI AND U-Pb_REDUX SOFTWARE
Open accessAbstract
In the past decade, major advancements in precision and accuracy of U-Pb geochronology, which stem from improved sample pretreatment and refined measurement techniques, have revealed previously unresolvable discrepancies among analyses from different laboratories. One solution to evaluating and resolving many of these discrepancies is the adoption of a common software platform that standardizes data-processing protocols, enabling robust interlaboratory comparisons. We present the results of a collaboration to develop cyber infrastructure for high-precision U-Pb geochronology based on analyzing accessory minerals by isotope dilution-thermal ionization mass spectrometry. This cyber infrastructure implements an architecture specifying the workflows of data acquisition, statistical filtering, analysis and interpretation, publication, community-based archiving, and the compilation and comparison of data from different laboratories. The backbone of the cyber infrastructure consists of two open-source software programs: Tripoli and U-Pb_Redux. Tripoli interfaces with commercially available mass spectrometers using standardized protocols, statistical filtering, and interactive visualizations to aid the analyst in preparing raw data for analysis in U-Pb_Redux. U-Pb_Redux implements the architecture by orchestrating the analyst's workflow with interactive visualizations and provides data reduction and uncertainty propagation that support data interpretations. Finally, U-Pb_Redux enables production of publication-ready graphics and data tables, the archiving of results, and the comparative compilation of archived results to support cooperative science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
U-Pb constraints on pulsed eruption of the Deccan Traps across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction
Schoene, B., Eddy, M. P., Samperton, K. M., Keller, C. B., Keller, G., Adatte, T., & Khadri, S. F. R. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2422 · Cited by 542
U-Pb geochronology of the Deccan Traps and relation to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction
Schoene, B., Samperton, K. M., Eddy, M. P., Keller, G., Adatte, T., Bowring, S. A., Khadri, S. F. R., & Gertsch, B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa0118 · Cited by 443
Self-citationBurgess, S. D., Bowring, S. A., Fleming, T. H., & Elliot, D. H. (2015) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.037 · Cited by 286
Self-citationGeochronological constraint on the Cambrian Chengjiang biota, South China
Yang, C., Li, X.-H., Zhu, M., Condon, D. J., & Chen, J. (2018) · Journal of the Geological Society · doi:10.1144/jgs2017-103 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowring, J. F., McLean, N. M., & Bowring, S. A.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- n/a-n/a
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145512890
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering cyber infrastructure for U-Pb geochronology: Tripoli and U-Pb_Redux: TRIPOLI AND U-Pb_REDUX SOFTWARE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2010gc003479
- The paper
- Bowring, J. F., McLean, N. M., & Bowring, S. A. (2011). Engineering cyber infrastructure for U-Pb geochronology: Tripoli and U-Pb_Redux: TRIPOLI AND U-Pb_REDUX SOFTWARE. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gc003479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.