The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationship between structures, stress and seismicity in the Charlevoix seismic zone revealed by 3‐D geomechanical models: Implications for the seismotectonics of continental interiors
Abstract
The Charlevoix seismic zone in the St. Lawrence valley of Québec is the most active in eastern Canada. The structurally complex region comprises a series of subparallel steeply dipping Iapetan rift faults, superimposed by a 350 Ma meteorite impact structure, resulting in a heavily faulted volume. The elongate seismic zone runs through the crater parallel to the rift. Most large events localize outside the crater and are consistent with slip along the rift faults, whereas background seismicity primarily occurs within the volume of rock bounded by the rift faults within and beneath the crater. The interaction between rift and crater faults is explored using the three‐dimensional stress analysis code FLAC3D. The rift faults are represented by frictional discontinuities, and the crater is represented by a bowl‐shaped elastic volume of reduced modulus. Differential stresses are slowly built up from boundary displacements similar to tectonic loading. Results indicate that weakening the rift faults produces a stress increase in the region of the crater bounded by the faults. This causes a decrease in stability of optimally oriented faults and may explain the localization of low‐level seismicity. Additionally, slip distribution along the rift faults shows that large events localize at the perimeter of the crater and produce focal mechanisms with P axes oblique to the applied stress field, consistent with historic large earthquakes. It is speculated that similar systematic rotation of focal mechanism P axes may be expected along other intraplate rift zones, raising a potential caveat for the use of focal mechanisms for stress estimation in continental interiors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the western Quebec seismic zone, previous neotectonic studies have mostly focused on seismology and sedimentology and less on earthquake geology and tectonic geomorphology.
“In the WQSZ, previous neotectonic studies have mostly focused on seismology and sedimentology and less so on the earthquake geology and tectonic geomorphology (Baird et al. 2010;Bent et al. 2015;Brooks and Adams 2020;Doughty et al. 2010;Ma and Motazedian 2012;Mohajer et al. 1992;Alinia et al. 2017).”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Baird et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1139/l02‐070 · DOI
- 10.1130/DNAG-CSMS-NEO.261 · DOI
- 10.1130/DNAG-CSMS-NEO.367 · DOI
- Adams J., 2003, Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada, Geol. Surv. Can. Open File, 4459
- Anglin F. M., 1984, Seismicity and faulting in the Charlevoix zone of the St. Lawrence valley, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 595, 10.1785/BSSA0740020595 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2007.03485.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2009.04275.x · DOI
- Bent A. L., 1992, A re‐examination of the 1925 Charlevoix, Québec, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82, 2097
- 10.1785/0120020217 · DOI
- 10.1016/0148-9062(85)90011-7 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB089iB11p09305 · DOI
- 10.1029/95JB03255 · DOI
- Hasegawa H. S., 1980, The Charlevoix earthquake of 19 August 1979 and its seismo‐tectonic environment, Earthquake Notes, 51, 23
- 10.1029/JB090iB05p03637 · DOI
- Johnston A. C., 1993, Average stable continental earthquake source parameters based on constant stress drop scaling, Seismol. Res. Lett., 64, 261
- Kumarapeli P. S., 1985, Vestiges of Iapetan rifting in the craton west of the northern Appalachians, Geosci. Can., 12, 54
- Lamontagne M., 1999, Rheological and geological constraints on the earthquake distribution in the Charlevoix seismic zone, Québec, Canada [CD‐ROM], Geol. Surv. Can. Open File
- 10.1016/0040‐1951(95)00120‐4 · DOI · Paper page
- Lamontagne M., 2007, Significant Canadian earthquakes 1600–2006, Geol. Surv. Can. Open File
- 10.1139/e73-004 · DOI
- 10.1139/e02‐046 · DOI
- 10.1130/2007.2425(02) · DOI
- 10.1130/L65.1 · DOI · Paper page
- McKenzie D. P., 1969, The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 59, 591, 10.1785/BSSA0590020591 · DOI
- 10.1029/91JB00958 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301‐9268(97)00038‐7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/JB076i023p05414 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012‐8252(94)90001‐9 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB092iB04p0E759 · DOI
- Somerville P. G., 1990, The 25 November 1988 Saguenay, Quebec, earthquake: Source parameters and the attenuation of strong ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 80, 1118
- 10.1130/2007.2425(01) · DOI
- St‐Julien P., 1975, Evolution of the Taconian orogen in the Quebec Appalachians, Am. J. Sci., 275, 337
- 10.1029/RG016i004p00621 · DOI
- 10.1029/170GM31 · DOI
- Townend J., 2001, The Nature and Tectonic Significance of Fault Zone Weakening, 13
- 10.1029/2005JB003759 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040‐1951(03)00227‐0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/DNAG-CSMS-NEO.339 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.238.4830.1105 · DOI
- 10.1038/365633a0 · DOI
- 10.1029/92JB00132 · DOI
- 10.1029/92JB00221 · DOI
- 10.1029/95JB03256 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Baird, A. F., McKinnon, S. D., & Godin, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering Queen's University Kingston, Ontario Canada
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- B11
- ISSN
- 0148-0227
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review