The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a new computationally efficient hydraulic model for simulating the spatially distributed dynamics of water surface elevation, wave speed, and inundation extent over large data sparse domains. The numerical scheme is based on an extension of the hydraulic model LISFLOOD‐FP to include a subgrid‐scale representation of channelized flows, which allows river channels with any width below that of the grid resolution to be simulated. The scheme is shown to be numerically stable and scalable, before being applied to an 800 km reach of the river Niger in Mali. The Niger application focused on the performance of four different model structures: a model without channels (two‐dimensional (2‐D) model), a model without a floodplain (one‐dimensional (1‐D) model), a model of the main channels and floodplain (1‐D/2‐D model), and the subgrid approach developed here. Inclusion of both the channel network and the floodplain was shown to be essential, meaning that large scale models of this region, including routing models for land surface schemes, will require a floodplain component. Including subgrid‐scale channels on the floodplain changed inundation dynamics over the delta significantly and increased simulation accuracy in terms of water level, wave propagation speed, and inundation extent. Furthermore, only the subgrid model showed a consistent parameterization when calibrated against either gauge or ICESat water level data, suggesting that connectivity provided by small channels is a strong control on the hydraulics of the floodplain, or, at the very least, that low resolution gridded hydraulic models require additional connectivity to represent the delta flow dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features
McFEETERS, S. K. (1996) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169608948714 · Cited by 7,725
Xu, H. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600589179 · Cited by 5,998
�ber die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. (1928) · Mathematische Annalen · doi:10.1007/bf01448839 · Cited by 4,106
The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
Leopold, L. B., & Maddock, T. (1953) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp252 · Cited by 2,966
A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation
Bates, P. D., & De Roo, A. P. J. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00278-x · Cited by 1,460
Self-citationPractical aspects of computational river hydraulics
Cunge, J. A., Holly, F. M., & Verwey, A. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,404
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Fewtrell, T. J. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027 · Cited by 1,273
Self-citationA Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance
Rodríguez, E., Morris, C. S., & Belz, J. E. (2006) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.72.3.249 · Cited by 1,106
A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model
Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., & Oki, T. (2011) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2010wr009726 · Cited by 932
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology
Biancamaria, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2016) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y · Cited by 458
A framework for global river flood risk assessments
Winsemius, H. C., Van Beek, L. P. H., Jongman, B., Ward, P. J., & Bouwman, A. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-1871-2013 · Cited by 448
Yamazaki, D., de Almeida, G. A. M., & Bates, P. D. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20552 · Cited by 276
Self-citationDevelopment of the Global Width Database for Large Rivers
Yamazaki, D., O'Loughlin, F., Trigg, M. A., Miller, Z. F., Pavelsky, T. M., & Bates, P. D. (2014) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2013wr014664 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Neal, J., Schumann, G., & Bates, P.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1694119402
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2012wr012514
- The paper
- Neal, J., Schumann, G., & Bates, P. (2012). A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.