The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The topographic signature of vegetation development along a braided river: Results of a combined analysis of airborne lidar, color air photographs, and ground measurements
Abstract
This paper combines archived remotely sensed data (airborne lidar and digital color air photographs) with nonsynchronous ground observations (including observations of topographic form and vegetation cover and growth) to test the hypothesis that colonization of exposed river sediments by riparian trees has an impact on channel form and to quantify any impact that is identified. This is achieved along a 21 km reach of the braided, gravel bed Tagliamento River, in northeast Italy, where the width of the braided corridor typically exceeds 800 m. Lidar data are analyzed to extract a 2 m resolution digital evolution model (DEM) and determine riparian vegetation extent, height, and structure within the active corridor. Aerial photographs are used to map the topography of the submerged parts of the corridor. These data are divided into 1 km length subreaches, which possess strong contrasts in vegetation height and extent. Joint analysis of vegetation and morphological properties of these subreaches reveals significant associations between vegetation properties and reach morphology. Residuals from a gamma function fitted to the topographic data for each subreach show a good fit with poorly vegetated reaches, but a weakening fit with increasing vegetation cover, largely as a result of the appearance of secondary peaks in the elevation frequency distribution associated with the heavily vegetated areas. Furthermore, the overall skewness and kurtosis of the elevation frequency distribution within each of the subreaches are both significantly correlated with vegetation extent, height, median elevation, and growth rate, indicating a clear topographic signature of vegetation development along this braided river that reflects sediment accumulation within and around the vegetated patches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Gurnell, A. M., Bertoldi, W., & Corenblit, D. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005 · Cited by 502
Self-citationMODELING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RIVER MORPHODYNAMICS AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., & Gurnell, A. M. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20014 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertoldi, W., Gurnell, A. M., & Drake, N. A.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1991305785
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The topographic signature of vegetation development along a braided river: Results of a combined analysis of airborne lidar, color air photographs, and ground measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2010wr010319
- The paper
- Bertoldi, W., Gurnell, A. M., & Drake, N. A. (2011). The topographic signature of vegetation development along a braided river: Results of a combined analysis of airborne lidar, color air photographs, and ground measurements. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr010319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.