The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying urban heat island effects and human comfort for cities of variable size and urban morphology in the Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
[1] This paper reports on the canopy layer urban heat island (UHI) and human comfort in a range of small to large cities and villages in the Netherlands. To date, this subject has not been substantially studied in the Netherlands, since it has a relatively mild oceanic (Cfb) climate and impact was assumed to be minor. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper reports on observations of a selected network of reliable hobby meteorologists, including several in The Hague and Rotterdam. A number of alternative measures were also used to quantify UHI, i.e., the generalized extreme value distribution and return periods of UHI and adverse human comfort; its uncertainties were estimated by the statistical method of bootstrapping. It appeared essential to distinguish observations made at roof level from those made within the urban canyon, since the latter related more closely to exposure at pedestrian level and to urban canyon properties in their close neighborhood. The results show that most Dutch cities experience a substantial UHI, i.e., a mean daily maximum UHI of 2.3 K and a 95 percentile of 5.3 K, and that all cities experience a shadow effect in the morning when cities remain cooler than the rural surroundings. Also, an evident relation between the median of the daily maximum UHI and its 95 percentile was discovered. Furthermore, the 95 percentile of the UHI appears well correlated with population density. In addition, we find a significant decrease of UHI and the percentage of surface area covered by green vegetation, but the relation with open water remains unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The energetic basis of the urban heat island
Oke, T. R. (1982) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49710845502 · Cited by 4,670
Thermal Comfort and the Heat Stress Indices
EPSTEIN, Y., & MORAN, D. S. (2006) · Industrial Health · doi:10.2486/indhealth.44.388 · Cited by 920
Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects
McCarthy, M. P., Best, M. J., & Betts, R. A. (2010) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2010gl042845 · Cited by 821 · cited 1×
“This definition is sometimes used in modeling studies [e.g., McCarthy et al., 2010], and therefore it is interesting to study the sensitivity of the results to the UHI definition.”
Method
Cited by
Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort
Klemm, W., Heusinkveld, B. G., Lenzholzer, S., & van Hove, B. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.009 · Cited by 373
Self-citationLemonsu, A., Viguié, V., Daniel, M., & Masson, V. (2015) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2015.10.007 · Cited by 319
Sgoff, C., Acevedo, W., Paschalidi, Z., Ulbrich, S., Bauernschubert, E., Kratzsch, T., & Potthast, R. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.4276 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Steeneveld, G. J., Koopmans, S., Heusinkveld, B. G., van Hove, L. W. A., & Holtslag, A. A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-10-29
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- D20
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030035564
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.