The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector
Open accessAbstract
There are few methodologies for the use of climate change projections in decision making or risk assessment processes. In this paper we present an approach for climate risk assessment that links bottom‐up vulnerability assessment with multiple sources of climate information. The three step process begins with modeling of the decision and identification of thresholds. Through stochastic analysis and the creation of a climate response function, climate states associated with risk are specified. Climate information such as available from multi‐GCM, multirun ensembles, is tailored to estimate probabilities associated with these climate states. The process is designed to maximize the utility of climate information in the decision process and to allow the use of many climate projections to produce best estimates of future climate risks. It couples the benefits of stochastic assessment of risks with the potential insight from climate projections. The method is an attempt to make the best use of uncertain but potentially useful climate information. An example application to an urban water supply system is presented to illustrate the process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Causes, impacts and patterns of disastrous river floods
Merz, B., Blöschl, G., Vorogushyn, S., Dottori, F., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Bates, P., Bertola, M., Kemter, M., Kreibich, H., Lall, U., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3 · Cited by 732
Maier, H. R., Guillaume, J. H. A., van Delden, H., Riddell, G. A., Haasnoot, M., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.014 · Cited by 490
Poff, N. L. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13038 · Cited by 389
Kwakkel, J. H., Haasnoot, M., & Walker, W. E. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017 · Cited by 261
Mahdian, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Siadatmousavi, S. M., Chalipa, Z., Delavar, M., Guo, M., Abolfathi, S., & Noori, R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32343-8 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M., & Li, K.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1562904705
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011wr011212
- The paper
- Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M., & Li, K. (2012). Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr011212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.